A democratic and constitutional beating for Vito Quiles

Elaborating that when the left shows aberrant behavior it is because it behaves like the right, is not the rhetorical genius that liberal commentators believe in. Because by doing so they only force a political cartography that perpetuates the “moral superiority of the left” that they so often claim to decry.

And, in fact, The left can also be totalitarian. In fact, it is the most common. Today, much more common than among the right.

For this reason, those who demonstrate incorruptible equanimity while also proclaiming their aversion to “agitators” like Vito Quiles and the left-wing fascistsThey don’t realize that, deep down, they are validating the ultra-alert government framework.

Because they help prevent this The real threat to social peace today comes from progressive violence. First verbal violence and, finally, physical.

If we want it to stop being used as a safe-conduct for intransigence, it is urgent to strip the anti-fascist cause of the halo of prestige it enjoys among broad sections of the Spanish population.

The anti-fascist cause in all its splendor is personified by Pablo Iglesias (with a totally civil war rhetoric reminiscent of the red violence that precipitated the military revolt) when he offers to “break the Spanish right”, to reach “wherever necessary”. But, yes, “you have to have courage”.

The coda is important. Because what these hotheads lack is courage, not will.

If the human material of the militant left were not composed of estrogen-induced asthenics, we would see in the streets and universities of the rest of Spain many more scenes of violence like those that proliferate in the lunatic and Third World turbulence into which nationalism has transformed the Basque Country and Navarre.

We have already written here that the murder of Charlie Kirk marked a milestone that brought to light how normalized the glorification of violence is among left-wing media, politicians and social media users, and The magnitude of hatred and resentment is growing.

Vito Quiles, precisely, aspires to imitate Kirk with his university career (although the distance between the intellectual density of one and the other is oceanic). And it has received similar treatment from Consensus replicators: it has even spread “hate speech”.

Consequently, intolerance must be prescribed for the intolerant.

That the majority of the sociological and institutional left sees “the boys of Alsasua” with better eyes than a conservative polemicist is the product of many years of a sentimental education in the doctrine that anything is preferable to a facade. This ETA is preferable to Vox.

And this is the reasoning of the Spanish Government itself.

It is no surprise that the president (who to this day does not condemn the aggression against José Ismael Martinez), agreed a few weeks ago with the executioners’ former spokesman on the need to take “firm measures” against acts of “fascist exaltation”.

This is not a mere imposture, but rather a doctrinal convergence of the left in the revanchist narrative about “democratic memory” (of which Bildu was one of the editors), and which is a faithful reflection of the asymmetric logic of the left’s amnesty.

The right is subjected to a relentless ordeal to give up its alleged authoritarian affiliation, while the left not only does not give up its violent genes, but is proud of them.

And not just Bildu, who never condemned ETA’s terrorism: also the PSOE. and there it is Pedro Sanches praising the memory of the sadist Long Knight.

The democratic rewriting of history is progressivism’s most powerful discursive tool for justifying right-wing ideological apartheid.

Because forgetting the recent past and distortingly remembering the remote allows us to convey the fallacious impression that the danger is represented by the “total impunity” of “Francoist organizations”, although reality shows that Violence in contemporary Spain comes almost exclusively from the left.

It comes from the same people who made escraches for Rosa Diezliving image of Goebbels. Of those called “phalangite” Alberto Riveraexcited, as we know, by Millan Astray. Of those who every week protect the fragile treasure of democracy from savages, forcibly preventing conferences and debates from being held.

On TVE, a charo argued illustratively that the cancellation of Quiles’ “Franco exaltation” act was justified because his supporters displayed “pre-constitutional signs”, not like the legal ikurriñas carried by committed nationalists. Therefore, “the law of Democratic Memory must act decisively”.

In other words, official orthodoxy already assimilates the “pre-constitutional” to the constitution of a crime and an object of prohibition. This and no other is the purpose of democratic memory: a sentimental re-education antifascist continue to narrow the field of opinion.

Given this state of affairs, the pretension of anyone trying to weigh two “extremist” poles, as if they were comparable situations (as parodied Cyriac: “None Stalinnone Pablo Casado: center centered”).

On the one hand, a phantasmagorical national-socialist threat that only exists in the fevered imagination of progressives. On the other hand, a reliable political culture of resentment, absolutely majority on the left and promoted directly by the institutions.

What exists is not polarization. What exists is an ideological roller coaster animated by a fundamentalist ideology that does not tolerate discussion. And as I believed that the battle of ideas was won, Now it is stirring furiously because for the first time these supposedly definitive consensuses are being questioned.

It is necessary to state categorically: they are the “anti-fascists” who, with their ideologizing hysteria, have poisoned coexistence, who embrace an exclusionary idea of ​​politics and who have dedicated themselves to demonizing dissent.

Those who are unable to separate beliefs and people say that Vito Quiles is a “provocateur” who only seeks to confront. But perhaps the problem lies in the fact that up until now the stupid and mephitic ideas of progressivism have not been confronted, which is the only thing against which the new right exercises violence today in Spain.