political analyst, Eduardo IbarraHe spoke with Canal E and explained the true scope of the debate on the 2026 budget, the tax code and debt requested by Axel Kiselov.
“yesterday In a marathon sessionLike all sessions in which there were no final agreements, which were scheduled to be held at two in the afternoon, and then ended at night and in the afternoon, In fact, it left a bitter taste for the governor.“, described Eduardo Ibarra.
Budget and tax law yes, debt no
Although the tax law and the 2026 budget were approved, a $3.6 billion debt was deferred, affecting a central part of Axel Kiselov’s financial scheme. He added, “The tax law and the 2026 budget were approved in both chambers, despite objections, and were not approved.” Debt processing was postponed until Friday“, he stated.
Ibarra emphasized that the Municipal Strengthening Fund directly depends on this mandate, as “8% of those 3.6 billion “It will be allocated to the fund.”
He then stated that one of the main obstacles in the negotiations concerns the leaders of the opposition community. In this context, he explained that both PRO and UCR are demanding more resources if the debt is not paid in advance: “They asked to accept that if the debt is not eliminated there will be a fund worth 120,000 million to strengthen the municipalities, For which Kiselov offered 30 thousand“This difference took the discussion to the limit and forced an extension:”This is one of the points of contention that hindered negotiations.which took her to Friday with a conservative prognosis.
Kiselov interned with La Campora
The interviewee predicted that in the days before the next session “they will negotiate All the time“Continuous meetings are expected between the ruling party and the opposition. In addition, he noted that internal tensions within the ruling party itself further complicate the scenario, in particular the dispute between Kicilloff and La Campora: “Governor Kicilloff He faces the additional problem of indoor-outdoor space with La Cámporain this case with Christina Kirchner. “This also hinders negotiations.”
The dispute also has an impact on the allocation of items: “There are some budgetary problems regarding the allocation to different municipalities La Campora claims that there has been intimidation of some municipalities“.