EU lawyers’ support for the amnesty law promoted by the government of Pedro Sánchez, at the request of Gontz, “Nothing changes” in the relationship between separatists and the Socialist Workers Party. This is what the leaders did … Training, although this ruling largely paves the way for the return of the former Head of State General to Spain, as the theses of the Community lawyers are usually included almost in their entirety in the rulings of the European Court of Justice, which in this case are expected to arrive before the end of the year. Guntz’s sources regret that what happened yesterday in Luxembourg indicates “that there is an attempt to delay the implementation of the law in an unfair and illegal manner,” they point out, as they were warning.
Carles Puigdemont’s followers insist that the break with the Socialists announced two weeks ago, which materialized last week with the amendment of all the laws being implemented and promoted by the executive, “has no going back, it is real and final.” It is a message that contradicts what they have conveyed from Moncloa in recent days, who believe that nearly two months without a full session in Congress will serve to redirect the situation.“They are very wrong.”Guntz’s sources indicate that ignoring the sustainable mobility law while refraining from closing nuclear plants allowed the government to emerge victorious from a vote that it considered a loser hours before it was held.
In the post-convergent ranks there Satisfaction with the statement to Dean SpellmanBut more because of the support given to the legal strategy that Junts almost single-handedly championed and led Gonzalo Boy Rather than the tangible effects it will have on their interests. In Carles Puigdemont’s entourage, they considered that the amnesty would be extinguished for several months in their own account with the Socialist Workers’ Party, and defended that the Constitutional Court “had no choice but to declare the ruling constitutional and provide cover for the president (Pigdemont).” They assert: “Imagine that Pompidou now said that this was unconstitutional, and the main political victim would be Pedro Sanchez.” Separatists use this argument to explain that “amnesty has already reached the point of no return.” They add: “No one will dare to demolish it.”
Puigdemont gives oxygen to the government
the The seven representatives abstained from voting The maneuver carried out by the People’s Party in the Senate on Thursday to include in the Sustainable Mobility Law prevented the suspension of the closure schedule of the El Maraz Nuclear Power Plant. Before the vote, the two parties in government, both the PSOE and SUMAR, assumed that the amendment would go ahead, and the Ministry of Ecological Transition even called a media briefing to explain what was actually responsible for the slide from the government: that the popular amendment had changed nothing and that the plan with Almaraz remained the same. The resignation of Gantz, who announced a few days ago her rejection of all laws promoted by the executive authority, He caught the entire parliamentary arch with the shifting foot. A few minutes after the event, Sarah Agesen’s ministry expressed its satisfaction “not to issue an amendment that only created a political uproar.”
The aforementioned amendment aims to suspend the current road map he proposed Closure of the first Almaraz reactor in 2027 and the second reactor in 2028. A situation that has generated massive political and commercial conflict, especially as a result of the power outage on April 28, as the Paris project and some sectors of the energy sector linked security of supply to maintaining the current generation potential for nuclear energy. On the other hand, there was the political and social problem posed by the possible closure of a factory that served as the economic support for an entire region in the face of the call for elections in Extremadura.
Junts’ decision was a surprise And also because the popular amendment opened the door not only to extending the useful life of the Almaraz factory, but also of the Cofrentis and Asco factories, which the Nationalists also advocate maintaining in the case of the latter. Junts’ spokeswoman, Miriam Nogueras, explained as she left the hall that the PP’s amendment was poorly proposed and that if it had been negotiated with them, the result would have been different. “We voted abstention, not against, because if you vote ‘no’ you deny the problem, and there is a problem.” Nogueras stressed that “in any case, the People’s Party will not solve the Catalan problem. We Catalans must solve it, starting with the Political and Social Council, which is the first party in Catalonia.”
The economic spokesman for the Popular Group in Congress, Juan Bravo, was responsible for this Receiving an unexpected blow For the formation led by Miriam Nogueras in the House of Representatives. He said: “Today there was an important decision to be made regarding nuclear power plants, and it is surprising to see pro-independence parties abstaining from voting or voting against nuclear power plants, and with Asco there they will have to explain their decision.” “Above all, it is very surprising to see the socialist deputies from Extremadura voting in favor of closing the nuclear plants,” Bravo continued, noting, “I understand that they will have difficulties explaining this to all the residents of Extremadura, who should know that their socialist deputies voted in favor of closing the El Maraz.”
About The Author
