to support Rodrigo Gonzalez and Gigi Mitri to project The law of influence Who seeks to claim Professional title For digital content creators it has sparked different reactions. During the last broadcast of their program “Amor y Fuego”, both hosts expressed their approval of the legislative initiative presented in Congress, which proposes to establish formal requirements for those who publish information about sensitive topics on social networks.
The project promoted by the congressman Wilson Sotosparked a division of opinions among public figures, specialists and the digital community.
In the TV space “Amor y Fuego”, Rodrigo Gonzalez and Gigi Mitri They approached the legislative proposal with a positive attitude, despite its subtle differences. Gonzalez emphasized that most digital content creators act improvised and lack the necessary training to report issues that may impact the public’s health or well-being.
“This is the minimum that anyone standing in front of a camera, or anyone recommending products that may affect our health in the first place, should ask for,” the driver said.
For his part, Mitry considered that the organization should not be extremist, but he acknowledged the need to set certain standards: “We do not have to go to this or that extreme. But something can be done. I think we will all agree,” as he expressed in the same program.
They both agreed that the requirement for titles or certificates should also apply to those holding public office, noting the presence of advisors and officials without adequate training.
Support for Gonzalez and Miter was framed in the context of growing concern about the crisis Misinformation on social media And the impact of digital creators on health, education, and security issues.
Legislative proposal submitted in November 2025 by Wilson SotoCongressman from Popular Action, states that Influencers, Banners A must have for opinion leaders who disseminate information about health, education, security or heritage Professional title Or an official certificate proving your specialization in the subject.
In addition, creators must be of legal age and registered with Register digital media and digital content creatorshe manages it Government Secretariat and the digital transformation of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers (PCM).
The project states that National Institute for the Defense of Competition and Protection of Intellectual Property (Indecopi) The Digital Government Secretariat will have the authority to supervise and punish those who do not comply with the provisions. Among the violations considered serious or very serious are the dissemination of false information about medical treatment, food or assets, as well as incitement to commit crimes or administrative violations.
The penalties provide for fines of up to 5 tax units (UIT), equivalent to S/26,750And prohibition from engaging in influencer activity for periods ranging from 60 days to three years, depending on the seriousness of the violation. The project also requires creators to verify the information they post and cite the sources used, especially when it comes to sponsored content.
The initiative sparked intense debate in public opinion and among digital content creators themselves. While some sectors see regulation as necessary to combat disinformation and protect citizens, others warn of the danger of limiting disinformation. Freedom of expression In the digital environment.
Congressman Soto defended the proposal, arguing that many influential people are abusing their access on social networks and spreading information without the necessary technical knowledge, which can put users’ health and safety at risk.
“We suggest that, to talk about a specific topic, the person who has a platform, at least to know, has to have a profession,” Soto said in an interview with Channel EN. The parliamentarian also stated that countries such as China Similar regulations already apply, although he clarified that the proposal in Peru seeks to open up debate in committees.
Conversely, Habla Khair presenters have criticized the initiative, noting that it represents a setback for digital freedom of expression and could exclude independent communicators who provide valuable content without academic support. “They are attacking freedom of expression, which is a constitutional right. Everyone can have their own space and talk about what they want,” they said during their broadcast.
In addition, they questioned the comparison with the Chinese model, warning of the dangers of authoritarian regimes replicating state control of digital content. If approved, the law will significantly modify access to and professionalization of digital content creator activity in Peru.
Requiring degrees or certificates could restrict the participation of young people and self-taught people in the sector, while raising standards of quality and honesty in information published on sensitive topics.
The debate also highlighted the contradiction of requiring academic training from influential people, while applying for membership in Congress only requires being over 25 years old and having Peruvian citizenship, as the “Habla Good” hosts explained. This discussion has reopened questions about standards of access and professionalism in various areas of public life.