Before the third session of the jury against Juliet McIntashThe well-known conversations between the judge and the rest of the court members were revealed San Isidro Who presided over the oral trial of the death Diego Maradona. It’s about to Maximiliano Savarino and Veronica Di Tommaso Who, in addition, must testify on Monday before the prosecution jury.
The messages correspond to March 17, the day on which the third session of discussion about the death of the Argentine star took place. The trial ended in a scandal over the filming of the documentary.Divine justice“, which McIntash raised during the discussion.
The sources of the case indicated information That the talks took place WhatsApp group shared by the three judgesnamed “The Dam Trial” by Diego Armando Maradona.
Chats you have accessed informationshows that his fellow judges were at least aware of his presence The camera that was going to record her at the hearings.
“Good morning. (Ezequiel) Klass (Ndr: Supreme Court Press) Talk to me and The July authorized camera subject asked meWe continue talking about the topic and we have to talk. Now I am in court, but as soon as possible, let me know and I will make time to join together tomorrow before the start. If July gets permission from the court, let us know, because that is not the case and we will avoid problems,” warned Di Tomaso at the beginning of the conversation around noon.
“I can’t today,” McIntash replied curtly. He added: “If Klass has a topic to discuss with me, let him write to me.” After just two minutes, he announced: “Ready. I have already spoken to Ezequiel. You will still be available in case he needs anything. Anyway, I will also discuss the matter with the court to make sure everything is fine.”
“What show or anything from the trial should we attend?” he immediately asked, though he turned back to the camera. “And I add so that you can rest assured.. Since they don’t film you, They will not leak evidence. “But I give it the formalities that Class needs, even though the court doesn’t need any.”
At that time, Savarino chose to respond to a question about the criminal process. “Right now, they haven’t offered anything. Anything, we’re in touch. “In addition, the notice of the accused (Ricardo) Almiron, which was resolved on Friday, was incorporated and recorded as having been received accordingly.”
Di Tomaso resurfaced, saying “We’ll see him tomorrow. I’m still on trial.”
In this way, the case added a new element that could favor the judge accused of violating internal rules and bias in the trial. The judge claims that she never acted in isolation and that every decision was shared and discussed in the internal group with Savarino and Di Tomaso.
The jury against McIntash arose after a complaint from the district attorney julio conte grand, who attributed irregularities in the conduct of the proceedings to the official, presenting as one of his arguments the alleged lack of communication regarding the audio-visual record of the oral trial.
The jury, composed of representatives of the Buenos Aires Supreme Court of Justice, the Public Prosecutor’s Office and regional legislators, proceeds to review the testimonies and documentary review of the case, evaluating the conduct attributed to McIntashe during the oral process that followed the Maradona case.
According to agency sources, the hearings could be extended until it is determined whether a penalty or impeachment should be applied, or if the charges are dropped.
About The Author
