Deputy Pro Marilou Quiroz On Thursday, she referred to the anti-vaccine event that she led this afternoon in Congress, targeting those who described her as a “donkey” and tried to “cancel” the event that she herself had organized months ago. It is that today is entitled “What do vaccines really contain?” Raised all kinds of questions Between legislators from different blocs Part of the medical community, which warned of the danger of publishing unfounded information, refused.
“Today we begin to strengthen the common desire: “Amending the obligation and obligation of vaccination and the possibility of delving into what we were vaccinated with during the pandemic.” Queiroz highlighted at the beginning of the meeting held in Annex A of the House of Representatives, in which various doctors and specialists presented an explicit anti-vaccine position with questionable data.
In her opening remarks, the Pro representative in Chaco thanked the attendees, and denounced the attempts to cancel the event several times. She then added: “There have always been sectors that seek to support one official story without any interest in listening to qualified voices, which is essential for science. “We know that in six hours when this is over we will not have achieved a tangible result, but we will make the issue visible and open to the community and Congress.”
In this way, Kairouz started the event which included presenting various discussion panels such as “Orthopaedics and autism vaccines”by the doctor Oscar Botta – Member of the international organization Doctors for Truth – and ““Victims ignored by the state: the blood of the vaccinated under the microscope”Presented by Dr. Viviana Lens.
The yellow legislator stressed, “My goal as a national legislator is to make room for the various positions that were freely expressed at this meeting.”
“The laboratories’ terms of confidentiality were never supposed to be accepted, and this is a point that deserves full transparency.” He claimed. Kayrouz previously expressed his opinion on this issue and expressed his doubts regarding the vaccines applied in light of the epidemic. He announced last October, in an interview with the Los Angeles Nation newspaper: “These are vaccines that were approved at an abnormal time, given the urgent need that existed at that time, and the scientific community acknowledged that some of the effects they may have in the future are still unknown.”
On that occasion, he also responded to those who rejected the initiative and touched on the necessity of “not silencing” opposition voices.
Kairouz insisted on this point this afternoon. “I can be ignorant on many subjects, But I am not ignorant of human values. This comes from the fact that they treated me like an idiot on the networks and said I would talk about something I didn’t know. But I listen and we must give the opportunity to those who know to speak,” concluded the professional MP whose term ends in December.
The meeting, which lasted approximately six hours, included some episodes that did not go unnoticed. Among them, a talk by Lorena DiBlasi, who appears on the Conicet website as a graduate in biotechnology. The specialist showed a man who had one of the supposed “consequences”, which she said left him taking two doses of the coronavirus vaccines produced by AstraZeneca, without showing any evidence.
“José Daniel Fabian” – this is how he introduced him to the talk – showed with a naked torso that metal objects “stick” to his body – and he made several failed attempts – and DiBlasi confirmed that it was “magnetization.”
“This is not oil on the skin, ladies and gentlemen. This has not happened to him. This is not being talked about. I would like to know what the doctors have to say,” said the speaker to the watchful eyes of the audience.
As had already happened when the lecture was announced, the event was brought up this afternoon All kinds of expressions of rejection and disavowal On different platforms. From the College of Physicians, in a letter addressed to the Minister of Health Mario Lugones and signed by Rubén Tucci, it was requested to suspend the event. They warned in a letter that this may cause society to be reluctant to be vaccinated, or raise doubts about the value of vaccines.
In the same vein, they highlighted that it would also represent “an enormous risk, especially at a time when we find vaccination rates alarmingly low, and diseases that, once fully controlled after the introduction of vaccines, are re-emerging as major health problems.”
In the same way, the Argentine Society of Vaccinology and Epidemiology preceded: “Faced with the organization of an event calling into question the effectiveness, safety and importance of mandatory vaccines, promoted by a national representative, a group of scientific societies (including SAVE) sent a letter to Congress requesting its suspension, considering that the said activity threatens public health.”