What positions and money do they offer to the opposition and La Campora?

In a last ditch effort before the parliamentary change, Axel Kiselov will seek to absorb as much change as possible Negotiation Tetris Collect two-thirds of the votes in both chambers of the Buenos Aires legislature and approve Debts exceeding $3,000 millionIt is a tool that he considers essential for the remaining two years of his administration. The reference to the 1980s video game, which consisted of arranging pieces into different shapes, is used by officials themselves to chart the difficulties of aligning not only the different pieces of opposition but also of Peronism.

“It will be finished these days. It seems to be on the right track but it is not easy and until the last moment you don’t know it, because it’s like a game of Tetris. You play one side and the rest moves, you have to make everything fit“, said this Sunday, one of the leaders participating in the talks that took place over the weekend, Multiple due to fragmentation From the political spaces: From the opposition are four different groups of extremists, three from the liberals and two from the PRO party.

All Peronist parties achieved a quorum in Friday’s failed session, although those appointed to negotiate by Kicilloff (Mayor Almirante Brown, Mariano Cascalares, and Minister of Infrastructure, Gabriele Katopoudis, both elected legislators, and Vice Governor Veronica Magario and Secretary General Agustina Vila) also failed. They had to overcome initial resistance La Campora and Jamahiriya.

In the budget already approved, for example, the head of the district Agree to include business financing To prevent the sewers of San Francisco-Las Piedras from overflowing, a claim from Mayra Mendoza, mayor of Quilmes, who warned that this was happening “Putting the opposition in charge” In light of the absence of funds necessary to mitigate the severity of the floods.

“We found a synthesis point, and the idea is to achieve it with the opposition as well.”“, explained by Máximo Kirchner. The debt request amounts to 3,035 million dollars – plus another amount for state-owned companies in Buenos Aires – and part of the agreement stipulates that 8% will go to municipalities. “Close to 30% is for fixed flows and the rest is linked to debt incurrence.”they detailed it in the government. The specific allocation for infrastructure works will also be void, which is another request from the mayors.

In negotiations over the charges Possibility of expanding Banco Provincia’s board of directorsin order to satisfy more sectors, although in principle it will seek to maintain the current eight seats and not increase them to 12. The talks include positions in Babro Group companies, regulatory entities, the Federal Board of Education and the Tax Court. In the House of Representatives, Peronism has 37 members and 62 members are required for two-thirds. The Senate has 21 members and needs 10 more: 31.

Facundo Tignanelli – head of the deputies’ bloc – negotiates for La Campora, Alexis Guerrera and Rubén Islamian for the bloc. From the Renewal Front, they identified the main obstacles as the demand by a sector of radicalism to discuss the integration of the Supreme Court and the conflict between La Libertad Avanza and the PRO, although they estimated that they would be able to overcome them.

The ruling party was able to approve the budget and tax law, which requires a simple majority. Because of the debts, the new attempt will be this Wednesday. In exceptional sessions despite the current composition of the two chambersBefore legislative change. Kiselov is sure that after the inauguration of the elected representatives and senators, it will be difficult for him to collect votes.

In government, they maintain the expectation that two-thirds will join, because otherwise the administration will be complicated not only for the province but also for the 135 municipalities, led by Peronist, radical, supporter and ward mayors. “It would be impossible to meet the budget. “There is no way to pay off debt maturities with income, at this time of such steep declines in collection and co-payment.”