The deputy of PAN, Claudia Susana Pérez Romeroestablished a position after the events in the Mexico City Congress, where a confrontation between lawmakers led to back and forth during discussion of species extinction Capital Transparency Institute (InfoCDMX).
In a press conference, he claimed that his party’s occupation of the podium was aimed at stopping the election campaign Agreement with an opinion which, in their opinion, changes the model of access to public information in the capital.
Perez Romero pointed out National action sought to defend accountability and the citizen’s right to information.
He stated that the protest was peaceful and that the physical altercation took place Morena legislators They tried to remove the opposition from the platform
He stated that several PAN MPs were attacked during the incident, including Daniela Alvarez, who, as he said, had been injured before.
The MP added that her group had decided not to do this Continuation of the session as a sign of dissatisfaction with what happened in the plenary session.
The deputy Daniela Alvarez Camacho She reported that she was injured during the events recorded in the legislative chamber.
She stated that she was pulled and pushed during the attempt Stay on the platform and pointed out that the attacks were recorded on video.
He also denounced the presence of masked people outside Congress who, he said, were swearing Lawmakers of the PAN and the PRI.
He announced that he would present it corresponding complaints for the attacks suffered.
During the same conference PAN legislators They explained that under the constitutional amendments, federal entities are obliged to harmonize their regulatory framework in terms of transparency.
They explained that the PAN had proposed that the new body be responsible for access to information in the city decentralized and collegialto maintain advisory mechanisms and counterweights.
They pointed that out brunette He propagated a deconcentrated one-person model, which, in his view, concentrates decisions in a single figure.
According to the PAN, there was a previous agreement for this non-collegial bodywhich, as they said, was amended by a reservation tabled on the same day of the meeting.
The coordination of the PRI group expressed its support for this Lawmakers attacked and condemned the events that occurred during the meeting.
He noted that the confrontation arose following non-compliance with legal agreements related to the legislation Transparency opinion.
The PRI reported that it would also seek legal action over the incidents and said it would not take part budget discussion, Considering that there are no conditions for the continuation of the legislative process.
Relevant facts about the confrontation in Congress:
- PAN MPs took the podium to end the discussion on the transparency statement.
- There was pushing, tugging and shouting between deputies.
- Opposition MPs reported physical attacks.
- PAN and PRI announced that they would not continue the meeting.
About The Author
