The President of the Nation’s Tax Court, Miguel Nathan Lightone of the options that the government was considering to fill one of the vacancies in the Supreme Court was reported this Monday in the Supreme Court Justice Councilor after it became known that a Book of his authorshipwhose quotes contained errors and inventions were at least partially created using artificial intelligence.
The presentation presents the controversy that the book caused on social networks and calls for Licht to be excluded from a competition and for a lawsuit to be brought against him. formal investigation.
“A series of irregularities have come to light on social networks, spanning the two volumes of the Treaty: inaccuracies, a superficial treatment of the subjects and, above all, incorrect and non-existent bibliographic citations, reported in a note published in the newspaper LA NACION,” the complaint states. Fernando Miguela journalist used to filing lawsuits in court.
Licht’s name has been mentioned in recent weeks potential government candidate for one of the two vacant seats on the Supreme Court.
In this context, he announced on networks that he would present “Treaty on Constitutional Interpretation: Contributions of Halakha to Legal Interpretation”. Legal book in the Confession Codewhose appearance was quickly interpreted as a wink at the president Javier Mileiwith close connections to Judaism.
According to various renowned lawyers on social networks, Licht’s extensive treatise contains errors and mentions fictional books, two of which are attributed to the court’s minister. Carlos Rosencratz.
“When I look at the citation list of a book on legal interpretation and without going into too much depth, I see that it is full of made-up books and articles that even their authors do not know. This is already beyond blackmail,” noted the lawyer. Ricardo Ramirez Calvo.
In a sort of defense he later offered on social media, Licht acknowledged the assistance of artificial intelligence in the creation of his book. “The sloppiness, haste and some unfortunate interventions by the AI could have played a trick on me”he explained, later adding that the book was written with “intellectual honesty.”
The complaint lodged with the council yesterday states: “This is not the first time that Licht has falsified information”.
“As to his background,” the complaint states, “he recalls having indicated on his CV that he had placed first in the competition for the Tax Court, when in reality another person (Gustavo Naveira) held that post. To make matters worse, he did so in an internal competition of the Supreme Court, of which he was then legal secretary,” Miguez said.
About The Author
