The diplomatic note formally delivered by the Chilean Foreign Ministry to the Colombian Embassy in Santiago expressed Chile’s deep discomfort with what it described as an attack on its sovereignty and the transparency of its electoral process. As Europa Press reports, the decision to transmit the document came after a direct instruction from the Chilean President in a context in which the national authorities assessed that the statements made by Colombian President Gustavo Petro exceeded acceptable limits in international relations and constituted interference in domestic affairs.
The Chilean reaction was triggered by the messages published by Gustavo Petro on the social network. Petro also added: “I will never shake hands with a Nazi or the son of a Nazi, they are the death of a human being.” According to Europa Press, these comments prompted an immediate reaction from the Chilean government, which saw them not only as a disqualification of Kast’s election, but also as a direct challenge to the legitimacy of the national democratic system.
Alberto van Klaveren, head of the Chilean Foreign Ministry, was responsible for delivering the diplomatic note to Colombian Ambassador Sebastián Guanumen. Europa Press stated that the document presented emphasizes the need to uphold the principles of non-interference and respect for self-determination between South American countries. The Chilean authorities pointed out that statements like Petro’s cross the boundaries of international political discussion and destabilize coexistence based on mutual respect.
Europa Press reported that in the same messages, Petro linked Kast’s victory to historical figures of an authoritarian nature, including General Augusto Pinochet and Adolf Hitler, and extended the controversy to relevant figures in the continent’s political history. He also referred to Argentine President Javier Milei’s public congratulations as part of what he called the “winds of death,” warning of a new adverse phase in South American politics. Petro expanded the discussion to include historical references by invoking the term “Grancolombianos” and calling on the countries that formed Gran Colombia to resist using numbers and expressions directly associated with Simón Bolívar.
In this context, according to Europa Press, the Chilean authorities interpreted that Petro’s rhetoric gives the Chilean electoral situation a regional dimension that goes beyond the country’s borders and is projected as an ideological confrontation in the South American region. The Chilean government believed that such demonstrations not only affected the bilateral climate, but also increased tensions in a region characterized by political polarization and different positions on the validity and meaning of democracy.
The diplomatic note, detailed by Europa Press, underlined the Chilean government’s position that the assessment of electoral processes is an exclusive prerogative of citizens and national institutions and that the possibility of criticism or intervention by foreign governments is expressly excluded. Van Klaveren stressed that the transparency and correctness of the Chilean electoral system is a matter of internal jurisdiction, stressing that the government he represents expressly rejects any attempt at declaratory interference.
The episode occurred after the presidential election, in which José Antonio Kast overtook Jeannette Jara in the second round with 58% of the vote. According to Europa Press, Kast’s victory, usually identified with his support for the Pinochet government, sparked debate both within Chile and in various regional capitals, given the historical and ideological burden associated with the figure of the former dictator. Petro took advantage of this circumstance to warn of what he saw as a threat to continental democracy and to expand the diplomatic conflict.
The Chilean Foreign Ministry stressed, according to Europa Press, that the main objective of the institutional response is to preserve democratic credibility and the autonomy of internal political decisions. The statement released insisted on declaring unacceptable statements that, in the opinion of the Chilean government, endanger trust, historical respect and cooperation between Chile and Colombia. The Van Klaveren government considered that the validity of the values of transparency and sovereignty were essential for stability and coexistence in the South American framework.
Regarding the impact of the conflict, Europa Press warned that the case had acquired international significance both because of the content of Petro’s statements and the scope of the Chilean statement. The exchange of messages and the debate sparked on social networks underlined the dimension that the issue has reached and highlighted the sensitivity of the democratic processes in the region to speeches that are interpreted as delegitimization by foreign governments. The situation increased attention in multilateral forums and underscored the importance of full respect for diplomatic rules and coexistence between states in South America.
According to Europa Press, the Chilean government reiterated its priority on protecting institutions, autonomy in political decision-making and protecting the right of the Chilean people to determine their destiny free from interference. The controversy, when applied to the regional scenario, reflected how national political processes can generate chain reactions and generate elements of friction not only between governments but also in the public and institutional perception of the role of international relations in South America.
About The Author
