seemingly, National government has evolved through Education Secretaryproject Educational law Under a luxurious title: Educational Freedom Act. It is not clear whether this is the case. Everything remains to be seen. There are only high achievers. However, as a precaution, progressivism came out with its fists raised to confront the reactionary attack, as they call it.
What was published helped raise the voices that contributed to the educational disaster. We will deal with these echoes in this note.
In principle, we will say that different governments, all over the world History of ArgentinaThey always had a word, a rule, or a law that directed education in the direction of their ideas. On this occasion, we will not discuss the history of Argentina. Only the last forty years
Doctor’s government Alfonsine I considered it necessary to hold an educational discussion. He was convinced that school and education in general bore a share of responsibility for the dreaded years of lead and death. It was about achieving a new paradigm that thinks about democratic renaissance. Then he called A Educational conference In keeping with the first serious discussion on the subject, which took place a hundred years ago, under the government of Gen Rock.
Enthusiasm in the world of education was general and participation was broad and generous. Intense days of heated debate ended, in short, on the decentralization and regionalization of education to adapt it to the historical and geographical needs of the provinces. It was, according to the climate of the time, to abandon encyclopedism, which approached the general to the particular, to invert the formula: from our world to the world.
A widespread idea has illustrated educational anxiety. A famous thinker of those years said: “The town where I was born, in the west of Buenos Aires, was thirty years ago the Rankel lands, but the school in which I taught officially ignored the Rankel family. We knew the Yan Zi Kiang, the Nile, and the Danube, but the school ignored the Salado of Buenos Aires” (Guarichi) Many teachers did not know or read Don Arturo; But they understood that a school without roots was up in the air.
Another conclusion for Educational conference The need was to expand compulsory education, improve the quality of education and integrate civil society and families to broaden the democratic base of the school system, because education was too serious a matter to be left in the hands of teachers.
In this contract there were three impulses in the direction of what was discussed and agreed upon Educational conference. Educational Services Transfer Law (1991), Federal Education Law (1993) and Constitution of 1994. Through the first phase, secondary and tertiary educational services were transferred to the governorates. The primary schools were actually handed over in 1978. Regionalization was not just a matter of curriculum, according to Jawrich, it was primarily a matter of management. The provinces had to take responsibility for their schools, he noted Constitution of 1853 Which indicated in its Article 67 that providing primary education to its residents is up to the governorates. the Law 1420 Compulsory and free primary education was limited to the capital and national provinces only, and the provinces that actually established schools were bound by the principles of law, through sovereign will and action. This federal management scheme has been changed by Lines law (4878), centralism and unitaryism, which caused nonsense like the following: “When the Greek language was being taught, Inspector Larsen del Castaño, who had mastered the Homeric language, arrived at the national school in a small provincial capital. He went to the Greek language class, and his astonishment reached no end when one of the students began to read the lesson. What did the teacher teach? asked Larsen, who did not open his eyes so as not to insult him. But when the class was In front of someone who could throw him into the street with one word, he said:
-Excuse me, Inspector. I am a father of a family, I have twelve children. I asked for a professorship and they gave me Greek. I pray for my creatures.
-Okay, I’ll pass it on, but what do you know as a Greek?
“Quechua, sir.” (Manuel Galvez. In the world of imaginary beings)
the Federal Law of 1993 It encouraged the strengthening of national identity, taking into account local, regional and regional specificities. It encouraged alternative education systems, especially open systems and distance education. Participation of family, community, educational associations and social organizations and the right of parents as members of the educational community to join and participate in organizations that support educational administration. In short, the school opened its doors to civil society and parents. the Constitution of 1994 I have incorporated into paragraph 19 of Article 75 what has been said so far.
The same character that I co-wrote in the 1990s Federal lawIn it KirchnerismDeleting what was written ten years ago. The matter is VilmosWe’re talking about it, it’s suitable for sweeping and scrubbing. in Education law Since 2005, the parents, community and organizations supporting educational administration have disappeared. The matter is FLAXO It becomes changeable.
As said at the beginning of the memo, it is not officially known but progressivism has already spoken. Katra He notes with horror the family’s interference or centrality in the educational event. “We reject it because it is a conservative project that imposes the idea of the family as the preferred figure responsible for educating its children, and obstructs any collective principle of socialization in schools.” If it is true that the law centralizes the education of children in the family, then it is a deepening of the line Federal Law of 1993. It is moving in the right direction because it distances us from totalitarian impulses. For example: “For the Bolsheviks, the family was the greatest obstacle to the socialization of children. Through their love for him, the family turns the child into a selfish being, encouraging him to believe that he is the center of the universe. It was necessary, then, to replace this selfish love with the rational love of a broader social family.” (Figs, you who whisperProgressivism is not the same, but it is similar.