Jonathan Andic, son of Isak Andic, who died a year ago after falling from a cliff on a hiking trail, admitted to the Mossos that He inspected the surroundings a few days before the walk with his father, as published The Spanish.
He was the only companion of his father, who loved walking in the mountains. Andic That day, he asked his bodyguard not to accompany themso father and son go on an excursion through Montserrat alone.
The Mossos are analyzing within the framework of the investigation opened for a year whether it is simply a prognosis or an element of a case marked by certain doubts, in fact, Andic is accused in this case. The businessman’s son and his sisters have always expressed their desire to collaborate with justice.
According to police sources, this new element adds another perspective to the case: Jonathan Andic was in Montserrat two days before the excursion with his father, “see the path” and “prepare the route”. He himself admitted this to the investigators when he was questioned about his precise knowledge of the terrain, the parking lot and the route.
“This data does not prove anything in itself. But in a case based on doubt, no detail is neutral”a regional police investigator tells the newspaper. Andic’s eldest son’s legal defense argues that this fact only demonstrates the son’s concern to allow the father to have an accessible path.
Some sources indicate that the route traveled by the Andic is extraordinarily simple. A forest ranger admitted to several media outlets that In 60 years, there have been no accidents the moment Andic fatally did it.
Jonathan himself explained in his statement: “I organized it and also chose the route.” In fact, he arrived alone in his car to check the terrain on December 12.
On December 14, father and son traveled through the Feixades. IThe reconstruction of the event is based on the son’s testimony, the technical data of the rescue and the medico-legal reports, he underlines. The Spanish.
The ground was “moderately damp”, according to the firefighters’ technical report.. Visibility was good. The wind, light. No signs of a struggle or any indication of the presence of third parties were found at the drop point. But the lack of evidence has not dispelled all doubts.
The judge therefore did not consider it closed. Jonathan Andic testified twice. The first, on the day of the event, was brief and marked by emotional impact. The second took place weeks later, already with a lawyer, and lasted more than three hours.
It is in this second statement that, according to Mossos sources, inconsistencies appeared: the exact location of Jonathan at the time of the fall, the exact position of his father, the location of the car in the parking lot.
There is one point that caught the attention of researchers: the photographs. In his first statement, Jonathan claimed that he did not take any images during the walk. A subsequent analysis of his phone showed that yes I took photos. With them appeared the metadata: time, approximate location, altitude.
In a case without witnesses or cameras, this data becomes a fundamental tool. They don’t explain what happened, but they help piece together where a device was at certain times. Inconsistencies, police sources emphasize, are not synonymous with guilt. They can be explained by nervousness, lapses or confusion. But they force us to continue our investigation. And that’s what happened.
For researchers, the challenge is to avoid two opposing errors: seeing intentionality where there is only planning or neglect an element that could be relevant.
About The Author
