The leader of the PT in the Chamber of Deputies, Lindbergh Farias, accuses Hugo Motta of not having respected a court decision and declares that the president of the Chamber should be held responsible for a crime of responsibility, under penalty of being removed from office.
“Hugo Motta must answer for an offense of responsibility. The decisions of the STF concerning Carla Zambelli (PL) and Alexandre Ramagem (PL) leave no room for interpretation. The judicial decision is that the board of directors, in cases with a sentence of more than 4 years, dismisses the parliamentarians. In the case of Zambelli, Hugo Motta led this process of transmitting the case to the CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission) for 6 months. He does not comply to a court decision and must answer for it,” Lindbergh said on Tuesday (12/09).
3 pictures
Close the modal.
1 of 3
Leader of the PT in the House, Lindbergh Farias
KEBEC NOGUEIRA/METROPOLES @kebecfotografo2 of 3
Hugo Motta, President of the Chamber of Deputies
KEBEC NOGUEIRA/METROPOLES @kebecfotografo3 of 3
Plenary of the Chamber of Deputies
KEBEC NOGUEIRA/METROPOLES @kebecfotografo
Asked whether Motta’s alleged crime would be subject to dismissal, Lindbergh replied: “Yes.” The parliamentarian also affirmed that the Speaker of the House acted with different rigor in handling the cases of Bolsonaristas and supporters of the government who occupied the chair of the Presidency of the House to formulate demands.
Read also
-
Paulo Capelli
US Treasury talks to Moraes about Magnitsky
-
Paulo Capelli
Video: House security officers attack four lawmakers, members of Congress say
-
Paulo Capelli
Planalto presents plan to stop PL that could reduce Bolsonaro’s sentence
-
Paulo Capelli
The slide Moraes vetoed during a session at the STF contained a quote from Zanin
“When Bolsonaro’s supporters stormed the House table in August (to demand amnesty), Motta acted laxly. Today, he sent the legislative police to attack the deputies (who were demonstrating in plenary session for the maintenance of Glauber Braga’s mandate). There were double standards,” Lindbergh argued.
About The Author
