The Senator of Buenos Aires, Malena Galmarini, spoke out on her social networks against the labor reform project promoted by the national government. He warned that “this is not the reform we need” and stressed that the Frente Renovador is working on an alternative proposal “that will increase formal employment by stimulating the economy and taking care of our SMEs, which generate 80% of work in Argentina.”
In this sense, the Buenos Aires Provincial Legislature highlighted the need for real tax simplification, emphasizing that “a small company or a micro-SME cannot be treated like a large company”. For Galmarini, the incentive should be “on production and innovation and not on speculation”. She also stressed that accompanying women must be a priority by promoting more loans, training and care insurance in the face of “the complete lack of investment in gardens”, and suggested the universalization of licenses as a way to achieve “real social justice”.
Likewise, the senator highlighted the situation of platform workers, calling for “transparency and dynamic income” and pointing out that “the algorithm must recognize rights and protections.” He claimed: “Our vision includes a working model with rights, protections and, above all, a future. We are not just trying to describe what is happening; we are working to change it.”
Authoritarians don’t like that
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a mainstay of democracy. That is why it bothers those who believe that they are the owners of the truth.
Galmarini questioned the results of the current economic model by affirming that “Milei’s labor reform is already underway and has already failed.” He warned that the consequences would be felt across all sectors: “Almost 20,000 fewer SMEs, an unemployment rate of 8%, which mainly affects young people and women, and a record multiple employment rate of 12%.” In this context, he emphasized that “they are not statistics, but shortened life projects”, warning that the decline in purchasing power is increasingly affecting teachers, pensioners and health workers.
Finally, he rejected the measures aimed at consolidating the reform under debate, warning that they imply “holidays at the request of the employer, salaries in the form of bonuses or tickets, salary caps, theft of overtime and the withdrawal of funds from social security to facilitate layoffs”.
About The Author
