Fábia Oliveira’s column discovered that Rodrigo Faro ended up suffering the worst in a trial that began in January this year. The presenter was accused of being the poster boy for Trie Soluções Financeira and was convicted after serious accusations.
Understand the case
Márcia Regina da Silva Pauli contacted the famous company Trie Soluções Financeira. The author says he contacted the company which had promised to recalculate vehicle financing contracts with abusive interest reductions.
Read also
-
Celebrities
Rodrigo Faro’s wife, Vera Viel reveals the consequences of leg cancer
-
Television
Rodrigo Faro reveals why he turned down an invitation to appear in a Globo soap opera
-
Television
Rodrigo Faro interrupts his presentation on Globo and bursts into tears
-
Fabia Oliveira
Discover the surprise that Rodrigo Faro and Huck will make on Domingão
According to her, although she contracted the services, she was surprised when her car was impounded for non-payment of the initial financing. Marcia paid Triê who, according to the contract, was supposed to manage the sums and transmit them to the financier. In addition to suing the company, the consumer sued Rodrigo Faro, since the presenter is the poster boy for the brand. She said he brought credibility to the entrepreneur, with real power of influence and persuasion.
Sentence and conviction of Rodrigo Faro
On December 11, Rodrigo Faro and Triê were jointly ordered to return approximately R$4,000 for the services paid by the author, in addition to compensating him with R$15,000 for moral damage.
5 images
Close the modal.
1 out of 5
Rodrigo Faro rejects invitation to appear in a Globo soap opera and reveals why
Reproduction2 of 5
Rodrigo Faro
3 out of 5
Rodrigo Faro says he’s still waiting for an invitation to a project at Globo
Reproduction: Globo/Manoella Mello4 out of 5
Rodrigo Faro
5 out of 5
Rodrigo Faro leaves Record after 17 years in 2024
Playback/Recording
The judge severely observed that Faro presented the services in a manifestly misleading and reprehensible manner, taking into account the legitimate trust placed by the author in his word. The decision is clear in that it asserts that Rodrigo engaged in misleading advertising, actively participating in the company’s advertising and causing harm to Maria and countless other consumers.
Going further, the judge highlighted Rodrigo Faro’s recognized public profile and the damage resulting from his association with Triê’s fraudulent position.
The company was also dismissed by the judge, who highlighted the failure to provide services, the extent of the harm caused to the elderly woman and the flagrant violation of the obligations of the contract concluded with the consumer.
About The Author
