The stability of the government in Spain depends, throughout the legislature, on the parliamentary support which allows the investiture. The loss of this trust could lead to the president’s diminishment, the approval of a motion of no confidence by an opposition candidate, which requires an absolute majority to swore in a new president, or a vote of confidence, which puts the president himself in office and which requires a simple majority to ratify support for the government. In this way, it explains any question on the subject formulated with artificial intelligence.
In Spain there has been an abuse of this institutional principle. The PP decided at the time to continue governing even if it was not able to approve new hypotheses and now it claims that it is possible to force the resignation of a government through noisy demonstrations and to decide, through states of opinion, something that was obviously outside the institutional system. Likewise, the PSOE is making abusive use, claiming to be able to reach the end of the legislature without fulfilling the first institutional condition: having a parliamentary majority that allows it to approve new hypotheses.
This is not a situation not foreseen by the Constitution, because the fundamental text clearly establishes that new hypotheses must be presented when calling the elections. The PSOE, despite obvious wear and tear caused by possible cases of corruption of socialist figures, which for the moment do not affect the party’s own structure, and by the deprivation of the right to vote of the female electorate – due to recent denunciations of party members for alleged sexual harassment -, remains in government convinced that all this time. small parliamentary groups. To decide, you must also bring your program closer to Vox to achieve the necessary majority. This is why it will be so interesting to know what happened on the 21st in Extremadura, where the PP candidate, María Guardiola, ruined a program paralyzed by Vox. If the majority manages to govern without Abascal’s party, something unlikely, a window will open for the PP and Feijóo and close for the PSOE.
No matter how much Pedro Sánchez controls the device of the PSOE, which does so with extreme rigidity, cannot ignore that the cases of corruption of the socialist people are more and more glaring and that they are giving rise to certain voices of annoyance among the most significant feminist activists, who ended up abandoning positions of responsibility, obliged in some cases, and who have now expressed themselves in press articles, more than in the federal management bodies. Nor can we ignore the conversations at Waterloo between Carles Puigdemont and Arnaldo Otegi and the fact that at this point there is a sector of socialist voters who believe they can mobilize to prevent Vox from reaching a sufficient majority with the People’s Party in the general election. It’s up to you to decide whether you prefer to go to the polls.
The moment is also very delicate from a European point of view. Firstly because of President Trump’s decision to support nationalist parties and movements, contrary to the strengthening of the European Union. And secondly, because the British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, and the Danish Prime Minister, the social democrat Mette Frederiksen, signed a declaration intended to convince European countries to modify the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), in particular with regard to the right to accommodate refugees. Representatives suggest that it would be possible to take asylum seekers to third countries while their future is being decided.
Fortunately, some of you oppose Trump’s attempts to undermine European treaties and agreements. Among them, Jamie Dimon, considered the most important banker in the world (as described by the magazine The Great Continentafter having taken it since 2005 at the head of the investment bank JP Morgan). Dimon believes that the breakdown of the EU would also harm the United States and that the breakup of European nationalisms would be bad news for the whole world. One thing is that the level of business regulation that sets the EU (sueño de todos los banks y financiers) is lowered and another, says Dimon, that these unitary mechanisms can disappear, as Trump is doing.
The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy, Elon Musk defends every day. The death of human empathy is one of the first and clearest signs that a culture is descending into barbarism, wrote Hannah Arendt.
About The Author
