The plenary session of the Judicial Council agreed Thirteen shortlists from different competitions will be sent this Tuesday to the executive so that a candidate can be selected there and nominated before the Senate of the nation.n.
These are key positions in national labor justice, along with the Federal Court of Mar del Plata, the Oral Court of Formosa and the Federal Court of Clorinda. Consequently, the body that selects and monitors the actions of judges has made progress in its attempt to fill vacancies, which is witnessing a crisis in most jurisdictions. Unprecedented with more than 30 percent empty seats across the country.
The Judicial Council, chaired by the President of the Supreme Court of Justice, Horacio Rosati, met to hear the report of the various committees and to proceed with not only the approval of the competitions: Competition No. 356, aimed at filling the position of Chamber Judge of the Federal Oral Criminal Court of Formosa; Competition No. 360 for the position of Judge of the Federal District Court of Clorinda, Formosa District; Competition No. 378 for a vacancy at the Federal Court of First Instance No. 1 of Mar del Plata and Competition No. 451, which aims to fill four positions of members of the Second, Third, Fifth and Seventh Chambers of the National Chamber of Labor Appeals of the Federal Capital; And competition No. 485, for six member positions in the sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth chambers – two positions – of the National Chamber of Labor Appeals in the federal capital.
The plenary session also advanced the investigation into a number of judges subject to scrutiny in the Disciplinary and Indictment Committee. Among them, the vote was unanimous in the case of the federal judges of Rosario Gastón Salmin and in the civil and commercial matters of Patricio Maraniello. They are analyzed in the indictment committee, which stipulates more serious penalties than the disciplinary committee.
Not only is Salmin investigated in the Judicial Council because he omitted to state that he was expelled from the judiciary for wanting to bribe an employee when they were both employees of the Social Security Justice System, but he has now been summoned for investigation because one of the repentants told how he ran a bribe with him in exchange for a precautionary measure that would allow him to obtain official dollars in the latter part of the government of Alberto Fernández.
Meanwhile, Maranello, who became known for accepting a precautionary measure on behalf of Presidential Secretary General Karina Miley, is accused of sexually assaulting a female employee and abusing workers. In recent hours, his defense had tried to remove the investigator from the case, Counselor and Senator Luis Goez, which was also rejected by the plenary session today.
When Rosati actually retired, There were other crossing points between council members. One was to start a summary of an employee working today in Seeley’s office. This is employee Maria Inés Brenna, who officially reports to the Human Resources Office of the Judicial Council but – according to the accusation – He hasn’t shown up for work in years.. Its former boss, Federico Vincent, who was in charge of the public sub-administration, has already been dismissed for serious irregularities, including paying his salary as if he were a judge of the nation and deducting underpayment from pension contributions. When the current administration asked Brenner to report to work, Actress K has requested to become officially certified for her membership.
At the plenary session, Cele stated that the woman worked for other consultants, something that – according to sources from the organization – was never formalized and she continued to receive her salary. When the summary editorial was actually voted on, Cele forcefully met with Judge Parwitavena when the case was actually voted on (“Don’t you want me to speak now?” he said) and stated that “political persecution” had been carried out. The judge accompanied her and Profetola said that the “opening of the summary” was being resolved and that the person there could provide all the clarifications.
The punishment imposed on another employee was also up for debate. It was the employee, Luciana Prudencio He had gone on a trip to take a course abroad in the previous administration. The committee voted to dismiss her, but Rep. Alvaro Gonzalez, who led the summary, asked for his proposal to be reviewed because he had not analyzed the documents well and asked for a lesser penalty, a 30-day suspension without pay, the maximum that could be applied under the regulation.
Cele also said that the woman had in fact done nothing wrong and that it was “negligence by the previous administration” and that she had done nothing wrong. The judge appreciated that Gonzalez admits “wrong when one makes a mistake,” and Judge Alberto Lugones suggested giving him 15 days. And there jumped the representative of the executive branch, Sebastian Amerio, Chairman of the Management Committee: ““Why don’t we also call her head of HR?”
He said: “I come from the judiciary and out of respect for all the workers who come every day, I do not think that this is a secondary issue. Of course I have sensitivity, but here today they were talking about precedents. I am a former judicial officer and until Rosati signed a two-day license for me, I did not go on vacation. That in court was not paid. From February to November 2023, there was no administrative action to justify that I was receiving an unpaid training course.” “It’s not a matter of giving him a quorum award either,” Parwitavena said sarcastically. She was approved for a 30-day suspension.