The Federal Chamber confirmed the dismissal of the writer, philanthropist and pharmaceutical entrepreneur, Alejandro Römers and finally dropped the criminal complaint filed against him. The crime he was investigated for was human trafficking after allegations were made against him. Roberto Mazzoni at a public session in the Senate in 2022. The court ruled The accusation was unfounded and ruled out the existence of a crime.
The decision was made by Chamber I of the Federal Criminal and Correctional Chamber, which confirmed the decision previously made by a first instance judge. In this way, the judge concluded that Roemmers The complaint underlying the case was unfounded from the beginning, as no evidence was ever presented.
According to the verdict, during the investigation, which lasted more than three years No connection between the complainant and the entrepreneur could be provenNor were any victims, evidence or concrete facts presented to support the accusation. Nor did any elements emerge that questioned his good name and honor.
Authoritarians don’t like that
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a mainstay of democracy. That is why it bothers those who believe that they are the owners of the truth.
Exclusive letters and visits, what was the relationship between Alejadro Roemmers and Pope Francis?
The court also found that the people brought forward as witnesses did not provide reliable statements. According to the judicial investigation, these were statements made by the complainant himself, who attempted to falsely implicate Roemmers in real events without support. Alejandro Roemmers revealed at what age he started writing and why he didn’t have a television as a child.
Once the dismissal has been confirmed, the case is closed was permanently closed. From the defense they stated that the verdict confirms that it is a false complaint They warned of the damage such accusations causeboth on a personal and social level.
After hearing the verdict of the defense attorney Juan Pablo Vigliero He explained that the court decision “confirms for the third time that this was a fabricated complaint for extortion purposes” and warned of the impact that these types of practices have on the justice system. In this sense, he pointed out that the use of false complaints not only entails a waste of public resources, but also “trivializes serious crimes and damages the credibility of the real victims.”
The reason he reiterated was that they were advertising legal action against those who promoted and spread the complaintwith the aim of determining those responsible for the damage caused.
LT
About The Author
