“But I view it critically.” “But I see it for fun.” “But I only see it for a little while because they’re characters“With all the entertainment that exists in our hands, those who celebrate the misery it causes should watch it. The twins’ house.
A reality show of banners which plays perversion as a surefire path to success. And he understands, of course he understands. It is easier to attract attention with the fight of “anything can happen” than with the creative development of a series or program. Even more so since social networks through which it is very easy to sneak into the cry without any code of ethics. No one seems responsible for their actions. The program thus brings us back to the school bully who celebrates the mockery that normalizes stigma. Even make the vulnerable person believe that they must do what their quarrels encourage to be accepted, applauded, taken into account by society.
Violence begins in the way we communicate. AND The twins’ house It has become so viral because it produces short, impactful videos that reward the sadism of algorithms: the throwing of objects, the broken utensils on the head, and the racist, sexist and LGTBIFobs insult that continues to be used by the merchants of ignorance. Then we are shocked by all the cases of harassment which are repeated in schools and we don’t think kids watch shows like these. The realities that present themselves to you educate you. The brand of references. The good, but also the bad.
But the twins are smart and try to turn the criticism around with a tirade of denunciation, such as expelling Labrador for his LGBTphobic actions. But they allowed it. They promote and nourish this environment. They make it profitable, just like YouTube by being the distribution channel. They represent thetense up until the last consequenceswhich is the basis of its format. But, at the same time, they know how to use their cynicism cards to give their audience arguments according to which “it’s just a game, nothing is happening” and that, thus, he feels that he has a self-justification to free himself from any moral dilemma. Even if, in reality, it is consume the extracts because they encourage this laughter which gives you the aftertaste of feeling superior to others. And think “it’s not so bad for me”.
We are faced with another link in the rise of populism: achieve a citizenship that confuses hatred and entertainment, individualism and freedom and dehumanization and modernity. If this reality If this had been carried out by attack dogs, it would have set off alarm bells. But no, the protagonists are people who believe that the more they denigrate themselves, the more they do themselves a favor. People seen by other people who don’t feel bothered by indecent planning in a house without daylight. These are generally the same people who use insults as their only form of self-affirmation, particularly when they feel challenged by an analysis on a subject. a format that is strengthening thanks to the complicity of social networks and platforms to which Europe has given free rein. Perhaps because he believed that tech companies were already taking social responsibility at home by building cheerful offices with slides and colorful cushions. Naive.
The audience of The twins’ house It is more about a minority than the agitation that is created around it. But its appeal is objective and reminds us of the cost of changing social sensitivities that allowed a country to improve. how quickly all that feeling of hope can be lost. Until it becomes a noise that confuses us. To the point of preventing us from differentiating what is entertainment, what is creativity and what is the chaff from which hatred arises, while many underestimate it, thinking that they are just four crazy people who make people laugh on the Internet.
About The Author
