
The President of the United States, Donald Trump, announced that it will present one only rule to regulate them Artificial Intelligence (AI)causing concern among sectors that promote government regulation. The federal approach aims to avoid regulatory differences between jurisdictions.
In this context Trump reiterated that he would publish a “rulebook” to standardize supervision across the country.
“There has to be a single regulation if we want to continue to be leaders,” he said in Truth Social. “This week I will be issuing a “ONE RULE” executive order. You can’t expect a company to get 50 approvals every time they want to do something. “THIS WILL NEVER WORK!” he said.
Trump announced that he would sign an executive order called “One Rule.” Federalize AI regulation. According to a preliminary version of the order obtained by The New York Timeswhat it takes into account is:
The president’s intervention sparked immediate reactions. Some states interpret the measure as a threat to the policies they have already put in place to address the risks associated with this tool, while other players in the technology sector see the proposal as a threat an opportunity to reduce the administrative burden of complying with different requirements across territories.
For some managers A patchwork of government regulations creates uncertainty and increases compliance costs.
“I think we have to find the right balance.said Google CEO Sundar Pichai in an interview Fox News Sunday. The technology leader pointed out that numerous bills are being debated in various local parliaments could produce regulatory systems that are incompatible with each other.
Other industry representatives expressed similar concerns. They believe scattered compliance requirements affect companies operating across the country. Furthermore, they claim that The lack of a clear federal standard means that each new tool is subject to different reviews depending on the state in which it is used or marketed.
“We are fighting over who will benefit from AI: the CEOs of Big Tech or the American people,” Sacha Haworth, executive director of The Tech Oversight Project, said in a statement cnn.
The concern manifests itself in the political sphere. The senator Amy Klobuchar warned against an executive order that overrides state laws could lead to citizens being less protected.
“AI is very promising, but it is also facilitates fraud and deepfakes “This is hurting Americans,” he said in a Facebook post.
Minnesota is one of the states that does this has already established rules aimed at limiting manipulated content and non-consensual materials generated by AI. Current legislation regulates the distribution of deepfakes for political purposes and penalizes the creation and transmission of unauthorized sexual images.
This type of norms emerged with the appearance of Tools to easily modify images and audios.
Current standards reflect different approaches depending on each jurisdiction’s priorities:
The simultaneous further development of state framework conditions raises questions the coexistence of several regulations in the face of a possible federal order that attempts to standardize criteria.
Tensions between the two levels of government became a central point of debate.