
Popular Party spokesmen argued that the appointment of Milagros Tolón as head of the Education Ministry represents a maneuver aimed at consolidating the influence of Pedro Sánchez and his internal leadership in the PSOE of Castile-La Mancha, at a time marked by electoral attrition and questioning of the regional leadership. According to information disseminated by El Partido Popular and collected in official reports, the main opposition force interprets the recent changes in the cabinet as part of a strategy aimed at ensuring the continuation of profiles close to the socialist leadership in a scenario of growing internal discontent.
The Popular Party explained that the promotion of Tolón, who served as mayor of Toledo, will be analyzed in the context of the executive’s perceived intentions to anticipate possible replacements in the party’s autonomous leadership, in particular the succession of Emiliano García-Page, the current regional president. As the PP reports, the designation reinforces the hypothesis that Sánchez would put himself in a position to control the PSOE’s internal balances in Castile-La Mancha, with the aim of avoiding ruptures in the face of foreseeable negative scenarios in future electoral events.
The opposition’s questions were not limited to Toulon. The People’s Party added that the appointment of Elma Sáiz, former Minister of Economy and Finance of the Government of Navarre, as spokesperson for the central executive represents a new criticism of the methods used to form the Cabinet. According to El Partido Popular, the opposition pointed out that Sáiz played an important role in the Navarre executive during the period in which a judicial investigation was carried out over alleged corruption in cases related to socialist leader Santos Cerdán. This context, as the PP emphasized, increased doubts about the integrity of the appointments and fueled the public debate about the lack of real renewal in the leading cadres of socialism.
As El Partido Popular reports, opposition representatives have noted a continuity of people linked to controversies or legal cases, which they see as an obstacle to the necessary distance from recent corruption scandals. According to the PP, these profiles do not contribute to political renewal but, on the contrary, increase the unease of socialist militants and voters disillusioned with the current leadership.
The People’s Party directly linked these procedures to the worsening of the PSOE’s electoral results in regions such as Extremadura. According to their analysis, based on internal reports cited by the Popular Party, the “historic defeat” suffered by the Socialists in the last regional elections in Extremadura had its origins in the continuity of candidates whose careers were drawn out by controversies and legal proceedings. For the PP, this factor influenced the loss of trust among the usual PSOE electorate and was crucial for the increasing support of conservative forces in the community.
The recent departure of Pilar Alegría from the Ministry of Education was also the subject of an evaluation by the PP. The Popular Party highlighted that Alegría resigned from office shortly before the start of the Aragon presidential campaign due to controversies related to his closeness to Paco Salazar, the former Moncloa adviser, when the allegations of sexual harassment against him became public. As El Partido Popular reports, this episode affected Alegría’s suitability as an electoral representative and could influence the development of Aragon’s political scene in the next regional election campaign.
The PP also interpreted that the electoral advance in Aragon came after the regional budgets could not be approved, a fact that led the regional president Jorge Azcón to call early elections, which precipitated Alegría’s resignation as minister and her entry into the election campaign. According to El Partido Popular’s analysis, the PSOE leadership repeated similar strategic mistakes in different areas, opting for profiles that did not reverse the loss of ties with important parts of the electorate.
PP analysts claim, according to El Partido Popular, that the succession and internal movements within the PSOE respond less to fundamental changes than to the need to maintain ties with leaders seen as “loyal” to Sánchez’s leadership. The opposition party argues that the PSOE’s defeat in regions such as Extremadura and Andalusia was not due to a general right-wing movement, but rather because, in its view, the socialists had abandoned the political center in favor of ideological positions of the left.
The People’s Party noted that the rise of conservative formations in areas traditionally associated with socialism was facilitated by the PSOE’s distancing from moderate sections of society, reflected in a greater institutional presence of the opposition in autonomous communities where socialism had until recently held sway.
Regarding the succession of regional leadership, PP spokespeople, quoted by El Partido Popular, stressed that the renewal that the country needs does not involve replacing García-Page in Castile-La Mancha, but rather replacing Pedro Sánchez as head of government. According to this position, the current movements respond to internal interests and not to the demand for self-criticism made following the recent election results.
The People’s Party collected various internal assessments that interpret the recent cabinet reshuffles as inadequate responses to political renewal. According to PP, the dissatisfied socialist electorate is demanding clear signs of turning away from problematic developments and greater openness to new profiles. The Party emphasizes that the consistency of the personalities appointed by the central leadership demonstrates the primacy of party political interests over the desire to reconnect with the traditional electorate, as expressed and published in various official communications of the People’s Party.