The Governor of Buenos Aires Province, Axel Kicillofrejected this Monday four specific articles of the spending order for the Chamber of Deputies Buenos Aires of the next cycle. The provincial executive objected to the trials of Financial transfer and the Inspection methods internal, which the Legislature approved weeks ago. This technical regulation caused a coordinated response between representatives of different political spaces.
The Provincial President vetoed Articles 14, 15, 16 and 17 of the Budget Law because concluded that these standards change current accounting processes. Regulation 14 provided that the Provincial General Accounting Office would validate the financial plan each year. It also ordered the Treasury to ensure capital was sent to the House of Commons.
Chamber of Deputies PBA
Provincial Peronism is watching this move by the governor with concern as it unites the Rejection of different groups who form the official front. Articles 15 and 16 state that the Bank of Buenos Aires Province runs a flow transfer system every day. This mechanism required a calculation based on provincial revenue without a specific allocation proportional to the current credit.
Article 17 concerned the Dear Court of Auditors in the event of any delays caused by the responsible authorities. This series of administrative restrictions motivates a common front between Kirchnerism, Massism and the sectors directly subordinate to the governor.
Alejandro DichiaraPresident of the panel and a reference associated with Cristina Kirchner, leads discussions to determine legislative strategy. The blocs are exploring the possibility of overturning the veto with the support of two-thirds of the vote or filing a claim for provincial jurisdiction.
Members of the Peronist bloc assure that the province owes the lower house about 20,000 million pesos. This financial situation led to delays in the payment of salaries to employees working in the various offices under the contractual services agreement.
Lawmakers from various political spaces agree that the Kicillof’s decision contradicts the provisions of the Buenos Aires Constitution. Article 94 of the province’s Magna Carta specifically states that the legislature approves its own budget and determines its staffing levels.
According to this text of the regulation, The executive branch lacks powers Veto the provincial parliament’s spending bill: The legislature approves its budget and agrees on the number of employees needed, its staffing and how they will be provided.
From the pro area they described the measure as unconstitutional and warned against a Possible power conflict. Some lawmakers believe that litigating the case in the Supreme Provincial Court is the best option to protect legislative autonomy.
In radicalism they consider the partial veto as one serious executive interference in another branch of the state. The unity of criteria between the opposition and the ruling party aims to restore the financial independence of the legislature given the discretion in the allocation of resources.
This content was created by a LA NACION team with the support of AI from a Article signed by Javier Fuego Simondet.
About The Author
