The recent elections in Extremadura anticipate an escalation of tension unprecedented since the civil war, since it has been shown that here we no longer vote with our wallet or by holding our noses. In reality, in Spain, we do not vote but we veto, because what … What we are looking for is something much more twisted: to prevent the person who won the elections from governing. Faced with such a political panorama, any educational aspiration is automatically excluded, since hatred is born from training. Never about education. If our politicians believed in political pedagogy, they should also defend private property and encourage the construction of social housing. Why don’t they do it?
Starting with private property, I guess PP, Vox, Junts and PNV should defend it tooth and nail. And what is happening at the PSOE? A majority of PSOE leaders and voters are also owners and I cannot imagine them meekly lending themselves to dispossession. However, among the parties that support the Sanchist regime, the dominant voice is that of those in favor of looting, confiscation and expropriation. Why is a transversal parliamentary initiative not being promoted that further strengthens and protects private property in Spain? Because the enemies of private property want to limit the wealth of owners. And this is how the annoying noise of the attack on the rich is born, as if there were no millionaires in progressive environments. For me, private property must be permanently protected from any confiscatory influence, whether that of Amancio Ortega or that of Rodríguez Zapatero. This is why the defense of property sheds more light on the housing problem.
If an individual, family or company owns huge real estate assets, why should it be expropriated, as Irene Montero asks? Having more houses you can live in or more books than you can read does not justify expropriation. However, the suspicion that the solution to the housing problem does not lie in construction but in expropriation is gaining more supporters every day, given the passivity of the PP, Vox, Junts, PNV and the PSOE itself. Why has the construction of social housing become another promise of Chichinabo along with the depoliticization of justice?
The construction of social housing faces two problems. The first concerns the crazy demands, since a young couple with a joint income of 50,000 euros per year would not have the right to request social housing. But the second is even worse: an unknown number of municipalities prefer not to build so as not to change the political color of their electoral lists. And the most terrible thing is that they proclaim it, because we have gone from secret ballot to public veto.
About The Author
