The constant presence of negative thoughtsEven in scenarios dominated by favorable outcomes, it responds to an ancestral function of the brain rather than a personal tendency toward drama.
According to psychologist Alberto Ramírez, a central part of our experience is characterized by what he calls “Negativity bias”a phenomenon in which “we tend to give more weight to the negative than to the positive.” The specialist shared these instructions via his TikTok account (@albertopsi.mentalmadrid).
Referring to everyday situations such as receiving “ten positive comments and only one negative one,” Ramírez explained that this tendency to focus on the negative is due to the way in which it happens The brain prioritizes “that which can harm us, even if it is small, specific or unimportant.”
Ramírez elaborated on the biological background of the phenomenon, claiming that the root of this mechanism remains in effect due to an evolutionary problem: “It is us.” programmed for survivalnot to be happy.” He explained that for millennia, recognizing any signs of danger “could save our lives,” which is why the mind “learned that the negative is more useful for survival than the positive.”
This inner alarm, acquired through necessity, “still works today, even when we are no longer surrounded by predators.” Although threats are different today, the brain tends to respond to smaller challenges such as work problems or family disagreements with the same intensity. This predisposition can lead to a constant monitoring and an exaggerated interpretation of the risks that makes it difficult to calm down and enjoy the successes.
The psychologist warns that this characteristic can influence the way we interpret reality and perceive our relationships and even our own identity. According to Ramírez, “we become addicted to mistakes, criticism, discussions or failures,” which brings about “the positive.” becomes invisible and the negative becomes the protagonist.” If left unchecked, this mindset can “distort the way we view our lives, our relationships, and even ourselves,” he noted.
However, Ramírez suggested simple and concrete strategies to limit the effects of this bias in everyday life. The first consists of “Take a conscious break” When faced with a side effect, ask yourself, “Is this really that important or is my brain overprotecting me?”
Another recommendation is to focus attention on what is favorable because, as the psychologist explained, “good things last for seconds unless you enjoy them,” and that is what he suggests record the positive at least “ten or twenty seconds” to cement it in your mind.
Among practical guidelines, consider “writing down three things that went well for you at the end of the day.” Ramírez described this exercise as “a workout to balance the scales.” It’s not about denying unpleasant facts, but about helping “Prioritize the things that are good”. Furthermore, he urged us to put negative events into perspective, emphasizing the importance of observing “the whole and not the detail,” since “one criticism does not define your worth, nor does one mistake define your abilities.”
Finally, Ramírez pointed out that it is advisable to practice self-compassion and remember that “this is how your brain works.” on purposenot by accident.” He invited people to talk to themselves “as you would talk to someone you love,” repeating, “The negative has a stronger impact, yes, but it doesn’t have to dominate you.”
Recognizing that this mechanism is universal and affects most people can bring relief and Promote change. By understanding this brain process, we can not only reduce self-boycott, but also promote healthier relationships and a more balanced perspective on everyday life.
About The Author
