
Beyond opposition to resistance, Peronism He prepares to discuss labor reform The government will seek to impose sanctions starting with the parliamentary change in December, in extraordinary sessions. Waiting to know which project Javier Miley will send to Congress, the representatives of the Union for the Fatherland will submit a report A compilation of their initiatives already submitted and others that will eventually be formed In the coming weeks to develop a kind of “regulatory pigtail” to change the legislation, generally in the opposite direction to La Libertad Avanza.
“We will discuss. We want labor reform. Not what is being circulated and what the government will send, but all of that is still up in the air.”A representative of the Union por la Patria bloc of representatives said. Legislators with union backgrounds will have a leadership role in the discussion. In this case, in principle, Without cracks due to internal Peronism: Sergio Palazzo, Vanessa Celli and Mario Manrique, allied with Cristina Kirchner, move together with Hugo Yaski, from the Axel Kiselov sector. In December, Hugo Moyano, the son of the truckers’ leader, who was promoted to the list by the governor of Buenos Aires, will take office.
Palazzo, vice-chairman of the House Labor Legislation Committee, is responsible for bringing together the bloc’s projects related to labor regulations. If the government’s text includes issues such as a maximum of ten salaries and not calculating the compensation bonus, or returning the so-called basket tickets, It will oppose Peronism. Or at least a majority, because the ruling party will try to open the cracks through negotiations with the conservatives. Osvaldo Galdo of Tucuman actually winked at Casa Rosada for this discussion.
On the other hand, and far from this rejection, the representatives of the “National Party” will propose a proposal Amendments to the Employment Contract Law, reduction of the working day, the right to disconnect from digital communication and extension of parental leave for childbirth or adoption.among other points. The aim will be to confront the ruling party on the basis of two opposing approaches regarding possible changes in labor legislation.
If what has been revealed is confirmed and the government strengthens the possibility of setting longer working hours and the hour bank mechanism for compensation, Peronism will raise its initiatives to move from the current 48 hours a week to 40 (as contained in the project prepared by Yaski) or 36 (Palazzo). “If there is a discount, we can accept the watch bank.”They made it a condition.
Likewise, if the ruling party proposes to enable vacations to be divided and to be in a period other than the period between October 1 and April 30, the Union for the Fatherland will push for them to be scheduled between December and March. He will also defend a project that gives people greater freedom to obtain a second job, if it does not belong to the same type of activity, and a regulatory framework for workers on digital platforms.
“Miley’s labor reform was just reheated soup for a recipe that had already failed. “They want to sell it to us as a novelty, but it’s a stepping stone to the past that takes us back to the ‘notorious decade,'” Yassky said when asked before. Clarion. “It is a lie that there is no suggestion. We have a set of projects that form an organizational strand to expand new types of rights in the face of new forms of employment relationsThe representative, who will renew his seat next December, continued.
In a letter she sent in February last year, Christina Kirchner thought about this “inevitable” He discussed what he called a “functional modernization plan.” “Rights contain obligations that must be fulfilled, otherwise they are a privilege, nothing more and nothing less.”“, he argued at the time.
Perhaps one of the blows of the October 26 electoral defeat was that Peronism in the Senate last week showed a less harsh stance than the radical and other opposition positions on reforming the UNU legal system. “We have many proposals on how to improve labor relations, but we do not know whether it can happen within this framework and whether the government wants to negotiate.”He raised one of the former president’s main swords in the Senate.