Everything is bad. Y happen simultaneously. The United States’ extreme unilateralism challenges Europe and the world. Great successes come together within a few hours.
In all of them, Donald Trump’s government ignores the mistreatment of its allies (his peace project in Ukraine) with initiatives that harm them. Boycott of multilateral forums (G20); Soil erosion is residually involved (Belém Climate Conference).
Absences, interruptions and proposals that Dictations – also accompanied by ultimatums – he prepares a diverse toolbox. But in all of them the confrontation pulses. In each of them there is one goal: to form a unipolar world with an imperial flavour, lacking rules, procedures and beings that resolve disputes by agreement.
A world in which other possibilities are good or bad for your whims and sense of humor: deep complicity with Putin’s Russia; The simultaneous confrontation with China under Xi; Attempt to surrender against Europe. In it, all nations possess a wealth of permanent examples and agreements that secure and protect them.
A world whose only law is the will of the tyrant, limited only by the ability to provide self-satisfaction. Heroic resistance in individual turmoil.
This is the design of the 28-point plan for Ukraine, which follows the agenda planned for Palestine. With the outcome expected and verified, the fire is more symbolic than real. This only changes the intensity of military operations and provides access to some food aid.
Aggravating factors: The plan for Ukraine testifies to Trump’s betrayal of his country’s positions in favor of the territorial integrity of the invaded country, and the international right it supports: confirms the validity of the gains of the invasion. He devotes loyalty to his allies in the European Union (and NATO), the primary civilian and military contributor to the resistance and the main victim of energy. protection From the invasion… behind the Ukrainians.
The opposing pole reproduces the force guidelines it used in its foreign war. As with it, Europe’s response is contradictory. Agree to offer resistance (albeit soft and pathetic) to each action. And the search for bilateral allies, as evidenced by the fabric of new or complete trade and security agreements with many countries: Canada, Australia, Japan, Mercosur, India, Indonesia… and even the shift between fear and need, with China.
But this network lacks an engine: it calls for the creation of an open, multilateral global forum that will revitalize, revitalize, or renew alternatives to sterile arbitration institutions (WTO), decadence (WHO), and short-term policies as development aid. If we Europeans lack this ability to come together, how can we aspire to play a major active role in this harsh new world?
About The Author
