The plenary session of the State Judicial Council must decide how to propose to the Executive the two final lists of candidates for two seats in the Federal Chamber of Córdoba in Chamber A and Chamber B.
he Contest 474 It was opened in 2022 to fill the vacancy caused by the death of a chambermaid Luis Roberto Rueda. The following year, the second vacancy occurred due to the resignation of the then member Ignacio Velez FunesHe was dismissed from his position after complaints of workplace mistreatment and sexual harassment of judicial employees.
Judicial Council, in this standard Not identical in all casesdecided that Velez Funes’ replacement would also exit the same process. By then The names of the candidates were already there Because they provided their background and took the written opposition test.
Final extension
On June 12, Board Selection Committee take Personal interviews. After evaluation and evaluation, two opinions were issued. The next step is to address both proposals by the entire membership of the organization. There are six names for the two positions, depending on how each is considered in order of merit.
Didi’s driver hit a passenger with a piece of debris during transport and left him in intensive care
Majority opinion
The proposal is signed by the advisor Alberto Agustín Lugones Thus, the final award of merit for the competition was determined:
1°) Pablo Roberto Toledo
2°) José Manuel Belisle
3°) Maria Soledad Mancini
4°) Manuel Celedonio Malbrán
5°) Facundo Carlos Cortes
6°) Gianotti, Germain Louis
7°) Patricio Lutral
8°) Gustavo Javier Zapata
9°) Andres Augustin da Rold
10°) Juan Manuel Fernandez Lopez
11°) Santiago Díaz Cafferata
12°) Juan Manuel Almada
13°) Facundo Troncoso
According to that list, the following applicants were proposed:
First list: 1) Pablo Roberto Toledo (Rapporteur of the Supreme Court of Justice of Tucuman), Maria Soledad Mancini (Secretary of the Federal Court 2) F Facundo Cortes Olmedo (Lawyer of record, economic crimes specialist and graduate professor at UBA).
Second shortlist: Jose Manuel Belisle (Secretary of the Public Prosecution) Manuel Celedonio Malbran (Secretary of the Federal Chamber), and German Louis Gianotti (Public Accountant and Registered Lawyer, Professor of Taxation and Economic Criminal Law at Siglo University 21).
On December 2, a jury will determine the future of the three prosecutors who investigated Nora Dalmasso’s murder.
Dissenting opinion
The dissident position bears the signature of Chancellor Hugo Galderisi. The final order of eligibility is as follows:
1°) Pablo Roberto Toledo
2°) José Manuel Belisle
3°) Germain Louis Gianotti
4°) Facundo Carlos Cortes
5°) Maria Soledad Mancini
6°) Manuel Celedonio Malbrán
7°) Gustavo Javier Zapata
8°) Patricio Lutral
9°) Andres Augustin da Rold
10°) Juan Manuel Fernandez Lopez
11°) Santiago Díaz Cafferata
12°) Juan Manuel Almada
13°) Facundo Troncoso.
Based on that list, the combination of shortlists is as follows:
The first short: Pablo Roberto Toledo, German Luis Gianotti and Maria Soledad Mancini.
Second shortlist: José Manuel Belisle, Facundo Carlos Cortes, and Manuel Celedonio Malbrán.
Oscar Gonzalez will stand trial over the Altas Cumbres tragedy: his defense will not appeal the test refusal
Last minute votes
The contestant yesterday, Tuesday, November 25th Patrick Luttrall – The current Criminal Secretary of the Federal Court 3 – He sent a memorandum to the Judicial Council informing him of his knowledge that one of the candidates, a lawyer German Louis Gianottiwas the subject of investigation in an economic criminal case processed in the Federal Court of Campana, which The agency was not notified. And another, perhaps, in Uruguay.
A few hours later, Giannotti himself answered: “I was wrongly accused Because it has absolutely nothing to do with the facts being investigated, and for this reason I was fireda well-established and past procedural situation within the jurisdiction of res judicata.”
He noted that Loutral had imposed “issues” on him. Wrong, and in bad faith And completely out of place about me.
He added: “When I had the opportunity to defend myself by presenting the relevant evidence, the public prosecutor in the same case requested my dismissal by ruling dated 05/22/2025, which was rejected by the intervening Federal Court, and it issued the aforementioned dismissal on 09/06/2025.”
Based on this statement, the Council is requested not to address the statements made by Lautral. “Either because it is fallacious or in bad faith or because it is unsound and inaccurate as described.”
The personal interview was conducted Three days after class Dictated by jCampana Federal Judge Adrian Gonzalez Charvay; Therefore he was not firm. Data This was not mentioned at any time during the process.Counselor Alberto Lugones – who presided over the session that day without leaving – did not consult him despite this Last year, he intervened in the file of being a member of the Federal Chamber of San Martin. The Court of Appeal of the Court of First Instance dismissed Giannotti, as he himself reported yesterday.