I started Maria Pombo With an honest and naive comment, ignorant and pure like a Japanese in a flamenco painting. He sparked some controversy, explaining that he doesn’t even read the aspirin leaflet. He wasn’t proud of it either. I don’t know if this is the beginning of a domino effect, however Everything has gotten worse. The pride of not reading grows every day, and grows even more when what is not read has a widespread origin or is contrary to one’s own convictions.
It is completely reasonable and understandable for someone not to read something in a public discussion because they don’t want to. What already What is not understood is that after not reading, there is more than one person willing to discuss the content of what they have not read. We are seeing several simultaneous instances of this approach. What is striking is the subtle and delicate way, like the blooming of a flower, in which many people, full of insurmountable prejudices, They unabashedly open themselves up to public and acknowledged idiocy.
If you are not going to read something or have not read it, please avoid the discussion. This is not the way we move forward. If you are against it and want to debate, read, argue and reach the greatest possible point of understanding. Maybe they improve or help the author. In novels we have the case of the Planeta Prize receiving constant criticism from people who have not read it, and we also have the very different case of the penultimate book about the Civil War being culled by a few non-readers.
Read or close your mouth. Don’t give us your cheap education of sentimental choruses with trendy little lyrics.
Another interesting case is a book case Soto Ivars In it, the author proposes to open the discussion he deems necessary. It offers years of work with testimonials, data and study. It would be very helpful to hear from people who do not share Soto-Evars’ work, and To be able to understand their motivations and explanations, but that has proven impossible. At present, people who encounter this author’s ideas pride themselves on the fact that they have not read the book and have no intention of doing so. Doctrines are complex, but they can be seen from afar.
Don’t read Supreme Court ruling on state attorney general It is also a mental balancing act. To regard a sentence that has not yet been written incorrectly is to carry dogmatism into the near future, To the futures market for ideologyWhere the bank always wins. Read or close your mouth. Don’t give us your cheap education of sentimental choruses with trendy little words. The world will be better.