The judge calls in experts to clarify whether Koldo Garcia’s voice was tampered with

Supreme Court judge Leopoldo Puente summoned the Civil Guard experts and the authors of the submitted report By former PSOE Secretary Santos Cerdán on December 11, to clarify whether the audio recordings seized from former Ministerial Advisor Koldo García were authentic. Manipulating it.

Puente issued an order before “Contradictions“It is located between the two reports on the case submitted by the Central Operations Unit (UCO) of the Civil Guard and the report submitted by Cerdan.

In July, the Supreme Court ruled out the existence of any such crimes Manipulating these recordings It is the key piece that supported the UCO report that led to Cerdan being placed in temporary prison, then released after five months in prison.

However, the expert report presented by Cerdan’s defense indicates that the recordings clicked on Koldo could have been changed. “Since no frame-by-frame analysis was carried out, it cannot be said that the recordings were not carried out changing“Edited or incorporated from external sources,” the study notes.

Given this situation, the coach called the next day the 11th at 10:00 and 11:00 AM. To the four experts from the Criminal Investigation Department The Civil Guard submitted two audio reports of the case, and they were summoned at 12 noon The two experts defend the former socialist leader.

The judge explains that it is appropriate to summon the authors of the reports “for a purpose Explain, clarify, or complete. The result of their experience, “thus allowing the above-mentioned extremes to be assessed, even in only indicative terms.”

All this, the judge adds, because “it is important” to know “whether the conversations contained in the audio files that were the subject of the experience took place or not.” Recorded live At the stations where they were found, or if they could come from other audio files that were later recorded there, as well as if said audio files are original, meaning that the possibility that they have been subjected to some type of tampering, cutting or editing can be ruled out.