The Seville Inspectorate filed a complaint with the Women’s Breast Cancer Association of Seville (Amama) regarding the unclear assumption of mammograms at the Andalusia Health Service (SAS), considering that there is no evidence of the crime of discovery or disclosure of secrets and computer damage as reported by the entity.
The inspector determines that the “torrent of petitions” causes the system to stop working normally, and that is why he considers that the error reported by the association never occurred and a crime was never committed, according to this article. ABC y han confirmed to EFE and these notes Fiscalía’s sources.
A complaint was then brought before the patients’ advocate to ensure that documents containing confidential information about the health and treatment of those affected could be destroyed. They reported possible crimes of infidelity in withholding documents, harming intimate relationships, and dishonesty in exercising public office.
For Fiscalía, none of these crimes were produced, which is why they decided to archive the proceedings, since they could not find “direct evidence of deliberate manipulation and that the downfall of the servers was the result of their saturation, as well as the inability to grant access to the number of requests submitted by viewers of the images corresponding to the citizen service module,” according to the archive text cited by the newspaper.
It also confirms that the clinical data appearing in the complainants’ medical histories are “integer, true and identical” and “there is no technical or documentary evidence of deliberate obliteration, human manipulation error or decision contrary to established clinical procedures.”
The president of Amama, Angela Claverol, last October 21 submitted a letter to the Public Prosecution Office to investigate the allegedly unclear medical records of the Andalusia de Salud Service (SAS) platforms. The health advisor, Antonio Sanz, negotiated flatly and asked the Amama women who decided to “throw money” at the operation of the Andalusian health system.
The unclear assumption, which this group understood could constitute crimes such as obstruction of justice, was discovered two weeks ago by women who attended the association after failing a breast cancer screening programme. According to Claverol, some examinations such as mammograms or ultrasounds have disappeared from platforms such as Click Salud or Derayah, and a change in nomenclature or the disappearance of the name of the radiologist has also been discovered in some of them, procedures that have now been rejected by the tax office.
On the same day that Amama reported on the alleged blurring and editing of images, the council dismissed it first only to realize, in the last hour of the afternoon, that an excess of inquiries about SAS applications had led to a collapse of the system, preventing users from accessing their history, a version that the tax office now also acknowledges, if women victims of breast cancer spend weeks without being able to access their tests.
In this sense, she included in Umama’s writings a specific case of a patient related to the supposed cancellation of a mammogram report and cancellation of an ultrasound examination. The IRS, based on its technical investigation, “eliminated any fraud.” The public ministry’s writing concluded that “the changes in the testing program adhered to clinical management standards and not external or malicious interference.”
When SAS consultation requests were restored during the early hours of the 22nd, many women found themselves with more mammograms than had previously been recorded in their history, or with new signs without indications of presumed malignant signs or with changes in the way the diagnosis was indicated. Bor Andalucía spokesman Enma Nieto demonstrated one of these tests that was supposedly changed during total government control. The board’s president, Juan Manuel Moreno, rebuked him for sending SAS employees, who, according to the Andalusian Popular Party leader, are the only ones who can change the rules.
The Public Prosecution concludes its memorandum by warning that this file “does not prevent the parties concerned from the possibility of sowing their contradictions regarding the delay or reprogramming of the tests or medical standards applied before the competent judiciary.” While the Public Prosecution of Seville has decided to address this matter, the Public Prosecution of Andalusia continues to investigate errors in the criminal programme.