Jose Luis Abalos fights from Soto del Real against Francina Armengol. The former Minister of Transport attacked the Congress President for… He is considered not defending his rights As a representative so as not to face the Supreme Court.
Former Minister … Transportation published a new message in His famous novel “In the Name of Abalos”.‘. It is a text attached to several documents he submitted that have not yet been responded to by the House of Representatives.
In this way, the former Socialist leader recalls that he issued a message on November 20 in which he spoke of “the obligation of the judicial authorities to communicate their orders and rulings that concern us, the representatives.”
«The two cases were asked to express whether they had anything in common The restrictive criteria imposed by the examining magistrate of the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court on his communications relating to judicial matters affecting me; “To urge the Chief Counsel of Congress to report on the scope of said regulatory provision and, finally, to request that the Court notify its specific decisions on said cases as dictated by the Chamber’s rules,” the document reads.
Despite this, Abalos explained that he only received a letter with board approval dated November 25, 2025. “Excuse yourself from answering me and judging my questions Surprisingly, they give me a completely contradictory answer and refer me to Art. 12 of the regulations, which speaks about the president’s actions in the event of the arrest of a representative or a judicial proceeding that may hamper her mandate, and stipulates that she must take the necessary measures to protect the rights and privileges of the parliamentarian.
“And I wonder, astonished, did the House of Congress actually know on November 25 that on November 27 he would be arrested and sent to prison?”
“And I wonder, astonished, did the House of Congress actually know on November 25th that he would be arrested and sent to prison on November 27th? “What actions did the President take that preserved my rights and privileges as a representative throughout my judicial process?” Abalos asks.
At the conclusion of the letter, Abalos recalls that he is still waiting for Armengol to give him a “frank answer” to his original questions. «I don’t want to be looked at badly He concludes by saying that the silence regarding my writing is a response to the failure to make a decision. He procrastinated so that he would not have to answer to me or face the Supreme Court.