Keys
new
Created using artificial intelligence
new
Created using artificial intelligence
Judge Arturo Zamariego The complaint is accepted for processing Submitted by the former spokesperson for Sommer, Iñigo ErrejónAgainst actress Elisa Molia, whom he attributes to accusing him of committing a crime The alleged crime of extortion About two witnesses who testified in the case in which he was investigated for sexual assault.
With the same decision, the judge of Educational Court No. 9 in Madrid determines the next session February 17 the appearance For both the former deputy and the translator, who must attend as the investigator and the accused, respectively.
In his report, Zamariego estimates that the facts contained in the complaint “present characteristics that make it possible to achieve justice.” Assumes the possibility of a crime of libelFor this reason, it is opening preliminary proceedings to clarify whether Mulia’s public demonstrations regarding Errejon exceed the limits of freedom of expression.

Before reaching this point, the defense of the former political leader had been promoted by A Conciliation law The actress demanded financial compensation of 10,000 euros if she did not retract her statements, a proposal she rejected, leaving criminal proceedings open.
In the document that gave rise to the complaint, it was confirmed that June 20 Borja and Soraya, organizers of the party at which the sexual assault reported by Mulia allegedly occurred, served as witnesses.
“Mullia reacted on his social network He was falsely accused of extortion He explained in his writing that they would testify in his favor.
It includes the text of the complaint Several messages The artist posted it on the aforementioned social network, including a message particularly relevant to this action: “No. Errejón refused to hand over his cell phone because he blackmailed two of my witnesses. Do not make up the truth.”
These types of statements, which directly link the former deputy to alleged illicit maneuvers on witnesses, are what the judge will now analyze to determine whether they constitute a prosecuted crime of defamation at the request of a party.