The Royal Academy of Fine Arts in St. Elisabeth of Hungary has suspended classes Francisco Arquillo Conference Scheduled for this Friday after receiving her Borofax of the Macarena Brotherhood It was stated that the professor had signed a … An explicit confidentiality agreement regarding the intervention that took place last June.
Urgent request to the law firm of Madrugada, Nertis ETL Globalwas sent to the head of the academy, which ABC was able to reach, citing “imminent violation of – Commitment to confidentiality and professional confidentiality» Assumed by Arquillo when participating in the treatments to preserve the honorary images of the Macarena.
Nertis influences the Burfax in the information previously published by this newspaper that the participation of Francisco and David Arquillo “is subject to A legal study of the possibility of committing professional negligence and/or breach of contract, which will be finally determined once the restoration work currently being performed by Dr. Manzano and IAPH is complete. Currently, as a preliminary step to the courts, David and the Research Foundation of the University of Seville (FIUS) are at the center of the fraternity’s negotiations to recognize the damage to the sculpture.
The burfax indicates that Arquillo does not have permission from the Brotherhood to reveal information about his actions in the Macarena
The existence of this signed confidentiality, as stated in the statement sent by the office, “it is strictly forbidden to publish information, images and/or results of the aforementioned work without obtaining express written permission from the brotherhood.” A Authorization “which neither Mr. Arquillo nor FIUS itself has.”As confirmed by the lawyers, who urge them to refrain from publishing “any data, image, report, technical and/or technical conclusion” of the intervention. They also warn against this, otherwise the Muslim Brotherhood The Macarena will demand corresponding responsibilities “By exercising whatever legal procedures are available to him, including claiming compensation for damages.”
In the face of this situation, the Academy decided, because it was not aware of the existence of this secrecy, to cancel the lecture, which was titled “Information about the conservative (maintenance) treatment performed in June 2025 in the form of Esperanza Macarena”in which the professor intended to present his account of what happened in those controversial days in June. This was the first time that Francisco Arcuo broke his silence since the interview he conducted exclusively with this newspaper last August. He stressed that he did not exceed his limits. In his works about the Virgin of Hope.