The court affirmed Grabois’ actions as plaintiff in the Libra case

He rejected defense proposals from Novelli and Terrones Godoy, who were being investigated for their alleged involvement in the launch and subsequent downfall of $LIBRA.

05/12/2025 – 12:24 pm

the supreme court The Ministry of Justice rejected a defense proposal Mauricio Novelli and Manuel Terrones GodotBoth were investigated for their alleged participation in the missile launch and subsequent crash sterling, cryptoactive which was published through a publication of the president Javier Miley On the social network “X”

The accused sought to separate a group of victims represented by the lawyer and the representative Juan Graboisbut Judges Horacio Rosati, Carlos Rosencrantz, and Riccardo Lorenzetti They considered the appellate complaint promoted by the defence Novelli and Terrones Godoy It was not directed against the final arbiter.

Libra case: Court approves Grabois and emerges a new millionaire victim

The file whose investigation has been delegated to the Federal Public Prosecutor Eduardo Taianois intended to determine whether there is a maneuver “Pull the rug” The process by which it aims to artificially inflate the value of a cryptocurrency and then cause it to collapse, resulting in extraordinary profits for developers and losses for thousands of investors.

In this context, Krasotskaya Svyatlana Vitalievnaa Belarusian citizen appeared before the judge Marcelo Martinez De Giorgi Asks to be made a special victim after claiming loss 1,768,079 US dollars Because of the movement created by Miley, who said at the time that he supported the project as an engine for the Argentine economy.

The dispute over the participation of victims as plaintiffs has been escalating since the beginning of the year. In February 2025 Judge Maria CerviniThe company that initially intervened in the case had rejected the request of three investors represented by Grabois and other lawyers.

but, The Federal Chamber in Buenos Aires overturned this decision and affirmed that “the actual legitimacy of the accused does not depend on proving the existence of the crime, but rather on the initial story that justifies the investigation.”

After the refusal, the defense insisted before the Court of Cassation, where after a new setback, it complained to the Supreme Court, claiming arbitrariness and violation of due process. The Ministers of the Supreme Court unanimously rejected this proposal. Grabois left his involvement as a complainant in the investigation company.

With the Supreme Court’s refusal… Judge Marcelo Martinez De Giorgi must now decide whether to include Vitalievna as a plaintiff and whether to grant her request to extend the ban on assets. Hayden Davis IThe promoter of the project I consider “Ridiculous“e”Irrational“The current confiscation, specified in 25,000 US dollars.

Final report of the LIBRA dollar investigation committee

The House of Representatives Investigation Committee concluded, in mid-November, that the facts analyzed were consistent with… Alleged cryptocurrency scam $LIBRA, As stipulated in Article 172 of the Penal Code. This opinion indicates that the president Javier Miley would have provided an indispensable collaboration To carry out the maneuver. The investigation highlights the seriousness of the situation and the need for an institutional response

According to the final report of the investigation committee. “It has been verified that the President posted a contract number related to $LIBRA that was not publicly available.”

“The Committee notes that the facts analyzed are consistent with an alleged fraud (Article 172 of the Criminal Code). The President would provide basic cooperation to implement the exercise“, highlights at the beginning of the report.

He explained that so far no explanation has been given as to how he obtained this information. This data strengthens the hypothesis of a direct and prior connection with the creators of the cryptocurrency, which is a key element of the investigation.

The collected elements intensify the assumption of A “Deception and deception.” The report added, “Javier Maile promoted this digital currency as an investment tool, when in fact it was a memocoin previously designed for a ‘rug-pull’ maneuver by an insider group. This type of operation leads to significant losses for ordinary investors.”