“Wrapped” by Spotify and Identity Ideology | ideas

“Spotify is the devil and absolute disgust and we need to go there, but please share more Wrapped (The most heard topics by the user in a year), which I like to see, and now we are all going in the other direction,” writes writer and journalist Guillermo Alonso (desired effect, Seix Barral) in your stories From Instagram. Spotify doesn’t mention the millionaire investments of its CEO, Daniel Ek, in military AI. That we all want to see everyone wrapped up is unacceptable. But why are we so delusional when we know what song we listened to the most this year or our musical era? Because it is a matter of identity, and nothing in this sign (politically and humanly) is more important than identity.

What is Identity By Wrapped on Spotify? Basically, it gives you the opportunity to be someone you think you are and show that to others. In terms of what they tell you how you’re doing, because you can’t know how you’re doing, I’ve heard more Lux the The life of a showgirl. What you actually feel (sympathetic, happy or evil…) doesn’t make you decide in a twist, it doesn’t actually matter, because technology has great news and can assure you, at the end of the year, that you have completely transformed into the character you thought yourself to be, into who you really are. How can you prove this? Well, look, because your top five artists are Nation of Language, Safe Mind, La Roux, Garbage, and Jade, for example. It’s very important that you share so everyone can enjoy… anyone.

The ability of the algorithm to provide identity is as important an issue for multinational corporations as it is for political parties, which in the coming years will not be selling ideas, but identities. The change that Ultraderecha has absorbed (their ideas are worth nothing and they can become president of EE UU saying that immigrants have become mascots) and that the left wing is not finished accepting it yet. Progressive parties maintain a pro-egalitarian rhetoric (many of the 20th century), when they create constituencies, clients, or voters and represent their identity; In particular, to be different (never the same) and preferably superior. Equality is morally good, but rhetorically unpopular because it does not build identity.

The obligatory question is how to sell and how to build identity in the 21st century. So far we have thought that identity is the intimate expression of who we are and requires caring for each individual, building a plastic and even poetic communication of what each person feels and ultimately tries to construct and decipher us. However, the identity that triumphs today is the public (internal) judgment of our identity. A list showing a number of He loves One declares politics about the fruit which says nothing, only who one is. But it is not that political beliefs determine votes; rather, many votes are secured on the basis of the identity they promised to provide: being more Spanish than the rest, for example. If you can vote that way, just like you can listen to music on Spotify, because even though its CEO has flipped $700 million into the war, he has an algorithm that leaves us with 20 years of our “music era.” Of course, there is no one to resist.