The silence grows larger and heavier. As Argentine football approaches the final of the Clausura tournament and urgent definitions are formulated about the next championship, the Argentine Cup and the 2026 calendar, the leadership climate is characterized by an uncertainty that is increasing by the day. In Ezeiza, Claudio “Chiqui” Tapia gathered the leaders of the First Division for a meeting that in normal times should have been used to organize the agenda. But in the end the scene was almost symbolic: protocol greetings, conversations without depth and obvious caution. The draw for the next tournament that was supposed to take place there was ultimately postponed.
The legal process investigating possible money laundering and fraud schemes involving financial firm Sur Finanzas added unexpected weight to an already complex end to the year. The more than thirty raids on the AFA headquarters, the Ezeiza ground, the offices of the Professional League and a long list of clubs – from Racing and Independiente to San Lorenzo, Banfield, Barracas Central and several from the promotion club – have brought any attempt at normality to a halt. The judiciary is looking for accounting documents, sponsorship agreements, loans and files that enable the reconstruction of today’s financial cycle. Suspicions of triangulation and irregularities triggered a domino effect that ultimately crippled the entire football ecosystem.
At the same time, silence became the rule. Neither publicly nor privately do leaders seem willing to say a word. The otherwise active WhatsApp group of the professional league has been silent since the beginning of the legal proceedings. Nobody wants to expose themselves, nobody wants to be involved in a scandal whose extent is still unclear. “Nobody is going to write a letter,” confided one interior director in a quiet voice, illustrating a common feeling: Any comment can become a future problem. The lack of statements is also a response to fears that the case itself could worsen. Because the raids are so recent and the investigation could escalate, many believe it’s wisest to wait.
In this context, the AFA and the Professional League published statements in which they tried to distance themselves from the heart of the matter and emphasize that the contracts with Sur Finanzas were “purely commercial in nature”. They are making themselves available to justice, although behind closed doors they know that the events of the next few weeks could change the decision-making structure. Some clubs are even starting to review agreements, sponsorships and internal files in case additional documentation is required.
The situation complicates not only institutional governance, but also the organization of football in the immediate future. Since the Clausura final is just around the corner, the definitions for the next tournament should be made. Format, schedule, zones, venues: everything is on hold. The postponement of the draw is a clear sign of how difficult it is to move forward in a framework without certainties.
The future will largely depend on the development of the court docket. If allegations emerge or the scope of the case expands, pressure on leadership will be inevitable. The internal reaction will also have an impact: an environment that has always favored quiet negotiations is now facing a visible crisis in which the times of justice collide with those of football.
About The Author
