The dismissal of Antonio Hernández from his position as the government’s number two presidential office was an important step following the spread of new information linking him as a suspected accomplice in the well-known Salazar case. According to the media covering the events, this measure was one of the most visible responses by the Socialist Workers’ Party of Spain (PSOE) to the growing complaints about delays in care and the limited institutional response to the complaints received through the party’s internal channel in Ferraz. The case placed the responsiveness of the executive, the PSOE and in particular the Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez at the center of public discussion.
During the Constitutional Commemoration Ceremony in the House of Representatives, Sánchez took personal responsibility for the time spent caring for the complainants related to the Salazar case. The media that documented his words detailed that the PSOE government president and general secretary said: “Feminism teaches us lessons every day, and I am the first.” Sánchez emphasized the importance of the institutional learning that these episodes leave behind and stressed the need to improve the handling of situations like this within political parties and in public administration.
The identified gap between the receipt of the first internal communications and the party’s effective response, which lasted up to four months, increased scrutiny of Socialist internal procedures. According to the above-mentioned media, the delay in responding led to several questions about the effectiveness and sensitivity of the existing protocols for dealing with harassment complaints within high-level political structures.
In his statements collected by the media after the case, Sánchez pointed to the PSOE’s willingness to differentiate itself from other political forces by publicly acknowledging mistakes and adopting corrective measures. According to journalistic reporting, the president emphasized: “The big difference between the right and the left is that when we receive these lessons, we ask for forgiveness and act accordingly.” This attitude was intended to underline the party’s commitment to self-criticism and the constant improvement of internal processes.
After the first testimonies appeared in July, when several Moncloa workers reported behavior that was considered inappropriate, both the government and the PSOE leadership defended the immediate separation from Salazar, according to the media, which closely followed the development of the case. As the investigation progressed and new documents emerged, the party intensified its actions by adopting new measures that ultimately led to the replacement of Antonio Hernández.
The episode sparked debate about the strength and appropriateness of internal protocols for dealing with harassment cases in the public sector and politics. One of the key points of discussion was the speed with which institutions respond to complaints, as well as the type of support and protection offered to victims and society in general. According to the media, various organizations and public figures called for greater accountability, demands for transparency and reparations for harm to affected people.
During his appearance, Sánchez refrained from giving specific details about the allegations, as reported by the media, but emphasized the role of self-criticism and the need to use the lessons learned from the case to improve institutional work in the future. She insisted that “feminism teaches us lessons every day, me first”, which was interpreted by the media as an attempt to publicly apologize and show the PSOE’s willingness to review and improve its internal policies.
Faced with increasing media and social pressure, the government and the PSOE stressed the importance of strengthening their internal rules for handling complaints and expressed their intention to proceed with caution in disciplinary decisions. The media detailed how, in the face of increasing documentation and greater demands for clarification, the socialist leadership has adjusted its institutional response and increased its commitment to transparency in the handling of the case.
The PSOE’s reactions and the growing media presence triggered a public debate about the institutional guarantee against cases of harassment in the workplace and the credibility of the protocols intended to prevent and sanction inappropriate behavior in areas of power. According to newspaper reports, Socialist authorities made it clear that Salazar’s separation of duties was due to the arrival of the first witness statements. However, they acknowledged that the duration of the deadlines for dealing with the crisis remains under the careful observation of public opinion and political representatives.
Pedro Sánchez accompanied his insistence on self-criticism by announcing a review of the internal regulations that govern the handling of complaints in the PSOE. Part of the institutional response to the impact of the Salazar case is focused on this process of updating and updating protocols to be able to act in similar situations in the future. According to the media that closely followed these decisions, both those directly involved and the national political environment have closely followed the development of socialist reactions, in a context characterized by the demand for greater transparency and self-criticism in public institutions.
About The Author
