“He carried out the alleged sexual assault brazenly”

“Due to the modus operandi, In the opinion of this investigation, it is possible that the accused committed these acts on other occasions, since on December 4 committed the alleged sexual assault, with impunity, boldly and in front of other people in the operating room, which indicates that it was not the first time he had done it”, as he maintains the Family and Female Reception Unit (UFAM).

Such a statement from UFAM comes after watch the two videos made by the auxiliary nurse that that Thursday he worked as circulating staff, in the operating room of a private hospital in Murcia, rented by Dr. David, to perform breast augmentation on a patient, using extraction of body fat: lipolifting.

So he placed the woman in a gynecological position on the operating table, with her legs spread apart, and without underwear as required by protocol. “Watching the videos, you can see the patient completely covered with sheets of blue paper, except for the thighs and genital area, and has David GS by extracting the fat with a cannula, make rocking movements back and forthwith the mask under the nose.

Such movements of the pelvis would be due to the fact that the surgeon would have penetrated the patient: “HE We see the pants at the feet, wrinkled. “Plus, you can see how the patient’s pubis moves when the doctor pushes.”

“This means that because the movements are so subtlea viewing report cannot be made in which the movement of the pubis is correctly perceived, therefore the video is sent due to excess space, for correct viewing.

These are the first considerations formulated by the UFAM researchers, for lack of in-depth analysis of the images which caused a health earthquake because Dr. David adds 15 years of experience in the field of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. In fact, she has two clinics in Alicante and Madrid and her curriculum vitae reflects her operations in private hospitals in Malaga, Toledo, Alicante, Murcia, Valencia, Torrevieja, Alcantarilla, Cartagena…

In this alleged rape with penetration of a patient, which occurred on the same operating table and with a completely helpless womanunder the effects of anesthesia, whose life depended on Dr. David, forensic evidence will play an important role because the victim was not conscious of anything.

For now, this second report to which this newspaper had access reveals data on analysis of the disposable material that was used during this surgical procedure, thanks to the fact that the hospital management decided to keep the trash bags. The decision was made after watching the famous videos and listening to the testimony of the auxiliary nurse and the nurse who assisted Dr. David (Mexico, 1979) throughout the operation.

“This means that in these facilities, they examine the disposable medical equipment contained in the garbage bags, and they do this using ultraviolet light, which, detects bodily fluidsreacts by lighting up the blue coat worn by the doctor during the operation. “That samples be obtained from the material for purposes of study and analysis.”

These fluid samples will be audited to the nearest millimeter in the laboratory for their relevance. All this, taking into account that the forensic report to which the victim was subjected also detected an injury in the genital area and the patient had not had any sexual relations before entering the operating room, on December 4, with this surgeon known as “educated”, “methodical” and “elegant”, who liked to listen to the romantic ballads of Luis Miguel during his operations.

“External genitalia normal. Vaginal introitus very atrophic, a vaginal speculum is used. A hyperemic lesion of the petechiae is visualized on the left lateral aspect of the vagina. (a medical image is produced with the patient’s verbal consent)”, according to this report, about the medico-legal report of this woman, whose last sexual intercourse dates back to June 2024.

In the first report revealed by EL ESPAÑOL, it was indicated that UFAM investigators checked the layout of the operating room of this private hospital on December 4, after the two witnesses to the alleged sexual assault said the following: “ANDI doctor David, as they say Ihas sickRa and Ihas assistantis the only surgeon who changes the position of the tensioner“.

In this audit, the Family and Women’s Care Unit says plastic surgeon I didn’t have the cannula when it was between the patient’s legs, to extract body fat for breast augmentation.

Additionally, he moved the operating table to see the operating room door, in order to control who was entering or leaving; He placed a device to “camouflage the doctor in his position between the patient’s legs” and went so far as to tell the nurse that “go out to lunch” in full operation.

Such situations lead the UFAM to state the following: “Betrayal is perceived on the part of the doctor, who plans this action from the first moment, change the orientation stretcher to avoid being seen and control the entry and exit door from the operating room, resort to general anesthesia, guarantee criminal action without risk for the perpetrator, nor ability to defend themselves for the victim.

There is another victim

The magistrate of the courts of Molina de Segura ordered the entry into prison of Dr. David because He assessed the “risk of criminal recidivism” because of his modus operandi and the “risk of flight” because he was born in Mexico and has family in the United States. Police investigations made it possible to detect a second victim, after three women reported to the police station and one of them declared having felt genital discomfort after retaining the services of this surgeon.

“These victims They could never suspect that they had been victims of sexual assault“, because they are in front of a health professional, to whom they entrust their life and health, without ever being able to think that this could threaten their moral and sexual integrity, as well as because this type of surgical intervention (liposuction) is physically embarrassing during their convalescence, and there can be no suspicion of having been sexually assaulted during the operation”, according to UFAM.

Raúl Pardo-Geijo, carries out the private accusation of the first victim of this health scandaland is cautious about the police considerations contained in the two reports. “In the situation where we only have 2 inconsequential images and where we see a thousand contradictory information in the media, caution requires caution.”

“It is claimed that the video clearly reflects the reality of a sexual assault and this is not the case: the Police and the judge they attach much more value to the testimony of nurses than to this video that even the superiors did not know how to interpret”, as reflected by the famous Murcian criminal lawyer, Raúl Pardo-Geijo.

“In criminal law, we must work rigorously, far from populist passions and I will do so, acting with maximum force, but respecting all fundamental rights, as my client logically wishes.”

The National Police confirms that the UFAM “keeps the investigation open“, to see if they can find more victims of sexual assaults perpetrated by Dr. David. So far there is evidence of two, but they do not exclude further because they consider that he acted “with abuse of superiority and trust, due to his position as doctor-patient”.

“We consider that it is possible that there is a potential number of victims of Dr. David GS, who did not file a complaint motivated by ignorance of the facts, under sedation, under chemical submission, without right of defense and subject to the will of the professional.